These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16120563)

  • 1. Specificity of learning in a video-aiming task: modifying the salience of dynamic visual cues.
    Robin C; Toussaint L; Blandin Y; Proteau L
    J Mot Behav; 2005 Sep; 37(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 16120563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: vision dominance or transformation errors?
    Proteau L; Carnahan H
    J Mot Behav; 2001 Sep; 33(3):226-34. PubMed ID: 11495827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements toward targets of different sizes.
    Proteau L; Isabelle G
    J Mot Behav; 2002 Dec; 34(4):367-84. PubMed ID: 12446251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modifications with aging in the role played by vision and proprioception for movement control.
    Chaput S; Proteau L
    Exp Aging Res; 1996; 22(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8665984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of oculomotor information in the learning of sequential aiming movements.
    Helsen WF; Tremblay L; Van Den Berg M; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2004 Mar; 36(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 14766491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of multiple movement representations with practice: specificity versus flexibility.
    Soucy MC; Proteau L
    J Mot Behav; 2001 Sep; 33(3):243-54. PubMed ID: 11495829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-selected visual information during discrete manual aiming.
    Hansen S; Cullen JD; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2005 Sep; 37(5):343-7. PubMed ID: 16120560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specificity of practice, visual information, and intersegmental dynamics in rapid-aiming limb movements.
    Yoshida M; Cauraugh JH; Chow JW
    J Mot Behav; 2004 Sep; 36(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 15262624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Allocentric visual cues influence online limb adjustments.
    Heath M; Neely K; Binsted G
    Motor Control; 2007 Jan; 11(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 17392567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Burg E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1335-51. PubMed ID: 18085947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of arm weight on C-not-B task performance: implications for the motor inhibitory deficit account of search failures.
    Rivière J; Lécuyer R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 May; 100(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 18313688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of increasing visual load on aurally and visually guided target acquisition in a virtual environment.
    Pierno AC; Caria A; Glover S; Castiello U
    Appl Ergon; 2005 May; 36(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 15854577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.
    Waller D; Richardson AR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of endogenous and exogenous orientations of attention on inhibition of return in a cross-modal target-target aiming task.
    Lyons J; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Dhillon VP; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2006 May; 38(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16709561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
    Mayer AR; Kosson DS
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand.
    Reed CL; Grubb JD; Steele C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 16478334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shift and deviate: Saccades reveal that shifts of covert attention evoked by trained spatial stimuli are obligatory.
    Van der Stigchel S; Mills M; Dodd MD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1244-50. PubMed ID: 20601705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chunking and compound cueing of movement sequences: learning, retention, and transfer.
    Cohen NR; Sekuler R
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Jun; 110(3 Pt 1):736-50. PubMed ID: 20681328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.