These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16120661)

  • 1. Anticipating the effects of gravity when intercepting moving objects: differentiating up and down based on nonvisual cues.
    Senot P; Zago M; Lacquaniti F; McIntyre J
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 94(6):4471-80. PubMed ID: 16120661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.
    Zago M; Bosco G; Maffei V; Iosa M; Ivanenko YP; Lacquaniti F
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 91(4):1620-34. PubMed ID: 14627663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intercepting free falling objects: better use Occam's razor than internalize Newton's law.
    Baurès R; Benguigui N; Amorim MA; Siegler IA
    Vision Res; 2007 Oct; 47(23):2982-91. PubMed ID: 17884129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual factors in hitting and catching.
    Regan D
    J Sports Sci; 1997 Dec; 15(6):533-58. PubMed ID: 9486432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of interception of moving targets by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in an automated task.
    Iversen IH; Matsuzawa T
    Anim Cogn; 2003 Sep; 6(3):169-83. PubMed ID: 12761656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coherence of structural visual cues and pictorial gravity paves the way for interceptive actions.
    Zago M; La Scaleia B; Miller WL; Lacquaniti F
    J Vis; 2011 Sep; 11(10):13. PubMed ID: 21933933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External timing constraints facilitate performance of everyday interceptive actions in children with Spastic Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy.
    Ricken AX; Savelsbergh GJ; Bennett SJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Dec; 410(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17101219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions: evidence for spatial prediction.
    Russo M; Cesqui B; La Scaleia B; Ceccarelli F; Maselli A; Moscatelli A; Zago M; Lacquaniti F; d'Avella A
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Oct; 118(4):2421-2434. PubMed ID: 28768737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining whether a ball will land behind or in front of you: not just a combination of expansion and angular velocity.
    Brouwer AM; López-Moliner J; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(3):382-91. PubMed ID: 16271742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual perception and interception of falling objects: a review of evidence for an internal model of gravity.
    Zago M; Lacquaniti F
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Sep; 2(3):S198-208. PubMed ID: 16135884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mental imagery of gravitational motion.
    Gravano S; Zago M; Lacquaniti F
    Cortex; 2017 Oct; 95():172-191. PubMed ID: 28910670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural prediction of complex accelerations for object interception.
    de Rugy A; Marinovic W; Wallis G
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Feb; 107(3):766-71. PubMed ID: 22090456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How position, velocity, and temporal information combine in the prospective control of catching: data and model.
    Dessing JC; Peper CL; Bullock D; Beek PJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Apr; 17(4):668-86. PubMed ID: 15829086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective versus predictive control in timing of hitting a falling ball.
    Katsumata H; Russell DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 216(4):499-514. PubMed ID: 22120106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optical acceleration cancellation: a viable interception strategy?
    Rozendaal LA; van Soest AJ
    Biol Cybern; 2003 Dec; 89(6):415-25. PubMed ID: 14673653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of visual motion on interceptive actions and perception.
    Marinovic W; Plooy AM; Arnold DH
    Vision Res; 2012 May; 60():73-8. PubMed ID: 22480880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.
    La Scaleia B; Lacquaniti F; Zago M
    J Physiol; 2019 Apr; 597(7):2021-2043. PubMed ID: 30644996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perceptual support of goal-directed displacement is context-dependent.
    Bastin J; Montagne G
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 376(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 15698933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cortical dynamics of anticipatory mechanisms in interception: a neuromagnetic study.
    Senot P; Baillet S; Renault B; Berthoz A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 20(10):1827-38. PubMed ID: 18370604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Weighted combination of size and disparity: a computational model for timing a ball catch.
    Rushton SK; Wann JP
    Nat Neurosci; 1999 Feb; 2(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 10195204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.