These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16120795)

  • 21. Normal and abnormal face selectivity of the M170 response in developmental prosopagnosics.
    Harris AM; Duchaine BC; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2125-36. PubMed ID: 16243056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception.
    George N; Jemel B; Fiori N; Chaby L; Renault B
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 15890502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of eye and face inversion on the early stages of gaze direction perception--an ERP study.
    Doi H; Sawada R; Masataka N
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1183():83-90. PubMed ID: 17927966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: Disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception.
    Rossion B; Caharel S
    Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(12):1297-311. PubMed ID: 21549144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Object representations for multiple visual categories overlap in lateral occipital and medial fusiform cortex.
    Pourtois G; Schwartz S; Spiridon M; Martuzzi R; Vuilleumier P
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Aug; 19(8):1806-19. PubMed ID: 19015371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Self-face enhances processing of immediately preceding invisible faces.
    Pannese A; Hirsch J
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):564-73. PubMed ID: 21168427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electrophysiological correlates of eye gaze adaptation.
    Kloth N; Schweinberger SR
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):17. PubMed ID: 21047749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. N170 adaptation effect for repeated faces and words.
    Cao X; Ma X; Qi C
    Neuroscience; 2015 May; 294():21-8. PubMed ID: 25772788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Face processing stages: impact of difficulty and the separation of effects.
    Latinus M; Taylor MJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1123(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 17054923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sub-exemplar shape tuning in human face-related areas.
    Gilaie-Dotan S; Malach R
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Feb; 17(2):325-38. PubMed ID: 16525131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using spatial frequency scales for processing face features and face configuration: an ERP analysis.
    Flevaris AV; Robertson LC; Bentin S
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1194():100-9. PubMed ID: 18190897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early ERP components differentially extract facial features: evidence for spatial frequency-and-contrast detectors.
    Nakashima T; Kaneko K; Goto Y; Abe T; Mitsudo T; Ogata K; Makinouchi A; Tobimatsu S
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Dec; 62(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 18809442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Amblyopic deficits in the timing and strength of visual cortical responses to faces.
    Bankó ÉM; Körtvélyes J; Németh J; Weiss B; Vidnyánszky Z
    Cortex; 2013 Apr; 49(4):1013-24. PubMed ID: 22578711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex.
    Ewbank MP; Andrews TJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1857-70. PubMed ID: 18343161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural correlates of priming and adaptation in familiar face perception.
    Walther C; Schweinberger SR; Kaiser D; Kovács G
    Cortex; 2013; 49(7):1963-77. PubMed ID: 23021070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rapid adaptation of the m170 response: importance of face parts.
    Harris A; Nakayama K
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):467-76. PubMed ID: 17573371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Encoding of faces and objects into visual working memory: an event-related brain potential study.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Berti S
    Neuroreport; 2013 Sep; 24(13):735-40. PubMed ID: 23921593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Similar neural adaptation mechanisms underlying face gender and tilt aftereffects.
    Zhao C; Seriès P; Hancock PJ; Bednar JA
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(18):2021-30. PubMed ID: 21810438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Broadly tuned, view-specific coding of face shape: opposing figural aftereffects can be induced in different views.
    Jeffery L; Rhodes G; Busey T
    Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(24):3070-7. PubMed ID: 17920099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.