134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16120877)
1. Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone height on direct digital and conventional radiographs.
Pecoraro M; Azadivatan-le N; Janal M; Khocht A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Sep; 34(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 16120877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of direct digital and conventional intraoral radiographs in detecting alveolar bone loss.
Khocht A; Janal M; Harasty L; Chang KM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 134(11):1468-75. PubMed ID: 14664265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra-oral storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures.
Kaeppler G; Vogel A; Axmann-Krcmar D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Nov; 29(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 11114666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of linear alveolar bone loss measurements of mandibular posterior teeth from digitized bitewing radiographs.
Hildebolt CF; Pilgram TK; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Fletcher G; Helbig JL; Bartlett TQ; Gravier M; Vannier MW; Shrout MK
J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 25(11 Pt 1):850-6. PubMed ID: 9846792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the diagnostic potential of direct digital and conventional intraoral radiography in the evaluation of peri-implant conditions.
Mörner-Svalling AC; Tronje G; Andersson LG; Welander U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Dec; 14(6):714-9. PubMed ID: 15015947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between panoramic and intra-oral radiographs for the assessment of alveolar bone levels in a periodontal maintenance population.
Persson RE; Tzannetou S; Feloutzis AG; Brägger U; Persson GR; Lang NP
J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Sep; 30(9):833-9. PubMed ID: 12956660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selection of the most accurate method of conventional radiography for the assessment of periodontal osseous destruction.
Pepelassi EA; Diamanti-Kipioti A
J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Aug; 24(8):557-67. PubMed ID: 9266343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of repeat bitewing radiographs determined by measurement of the distance between the amelocemental junction and the alveolar crest: an ex vivo study using human skulls.
Bishop K; Dummer PM; Kingdon A; Newcombe RG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 8617391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone changes from color-coded with subtraction radiographs.
Shi XQ; Eklund I; Tronje G; Welander U; Stamatakis HC; Engström PE; Engström GN
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10202476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alveolar bone height of primary and first permanent molars in healthy seven- to nine-year-old children.
Needleman HL; Ku TC; Nelson L; Allred E; Seow WK
ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(3):188-96, 165. PubMed ID: 9262800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level.
Akesson L
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 78():1-129. PubMed ID: 1896925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can nonstandardized bitewing radiographs be used to assess the presence of alveolar bone loss in epidemiologic studies?
Merchant AT; Pitiphat W; Parker J; Joshipura K; Kellerman M; Douglass CW
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 32(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 15239778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic detection and assessment of the periodontal endosseous defects.
Pepelassi EA; Tsiklakis K; Diamanti-Kipioti A
J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 10783834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationships between bitewing and periapical radiographs in assessing crestal alveolar bone levels.
Reed BE; Polson AM
J Periodontol; 1984 Jan; 55(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 6582261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of assessing interproximal bone loss by digital radiography: intrabony defects.
Wolf B; von Bethlenfalvy E; Hassfeld S; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 28(9):869-78. PubMed ID: 11493358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
