These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16121585)

  • 1. Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: preliminary results.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Suzuki K; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Newstead GM; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2295-304. PubMed ID: 16121585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: Preliminary results.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Suzuki K; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Newstead GM; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7Part1):2295-2304. PubMed ID: 28493579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of psychophysical similarity measures for selection of similar images in the diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt R; Shiraishi J; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5695-702. PubMed ID: 19175126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 19268856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation of radiologists' perception of lesion similarity: observations with paired breast masses on mammograms and paired lung nodules on CT images.
    Kumazawa S; Muramatsu C; Li Q; Li F; Shiraishi J; Caligiuri P; Schmidt RA; MacMahon H; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):887-94. PubMed ID: 18572125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Suzuki K; Newstead GM; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2890-5. PubMed ID: 17821997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subjective similarity of patterns of diffuse interstitial lung disease on thin-section CT: an observer performance study.
    Li F; Kumazawa S; Shiraishi J; Li Q; Engelmann R; Caligiuri P; MacMahon H; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):477-85. PubMed ID: 19268860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method to improve visual similarity of breast masses for an interactive computer-aided diagnosis environment.
    Zheng B; Lu A; Hardesty LA; Sumkin JH; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 16485416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of objective similarity measures for selecting similar images of mammographic lesions.
    Nakayama R; Abe H; Shiraishi J; Doi K
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Feb; 24(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 20352281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography.
    El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15493691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms.
    Tourassi GD; Harrawood B; Singh S; Lo JY; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 17278499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
    Singh S; Bovis K
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of perceived similarity between pairs of microcalcification clusters in mammograms.
    Wang J; Jing H; Wernick MN; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051904. PubMed ID: 24784383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms.
    Filev P; Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 15789598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Steepest changes of a probability-based cost function for delineation of mammographic masses: a validation study.
    Kinnard L; Lo SC; Makariou E; Osicka T; Wang P; Chouikha MF; Freedman MT
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2796-810. PubMed ID: 15543787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental determination of subjective similarity for pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: observer study results.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt R; Suzuki K; Shiraishi J; Newstead G; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3460-8. PubMed ID: 17022242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratification.
    Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Wang XH; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1234-41. PubMed ID: 20619697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of new psychophysical measures for evaluation of similar images on thoracic computed tomography for distinction between benign and malignant nodules.
    Li Q; Li F; Shiraishi J; Katsuragawa S; Sone S; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2584-93. PubMed ID: 14596294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Similarity evaluation in a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) CADx system for characterization of breast masses on ultrasound images.
    Cho HC; Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Helvie M; Paramagul C; Nees AV
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1820-31. PubMed ID: 21626916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.