These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16121651)

  • 1. [Criteria for the development and evaluation of decision aids].
    Kasper J; Lenz M
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2005; 99(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 16121651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Searching for diabetes decision aids and related background information.
    Lenz M; Kasper J; Mühlhauser I
    Diabet Med; 2006 Aug; 23(8):912-6. PubMed ID: 16911631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation tools for patient information commonly used in Germany--a critical analysis].
    Köpke S; Berger B; Steckelberg A; Meyer G
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2005; 99(6):353-7. PubMed ID: 16121650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The evidence base of clinical practice guidelines, health technology assessments and patient information as a basis for clinical decision-making].
    Antes G
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2004 May; 98(3):180-4; discussion 190-2, 214-5. PubMed ID: 15250384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient decision aids to support clinical decision making: evaluating the decision or the outcomes of the decision.
    McCaffery K; Irwig L; Bossuyt P
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 17873254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
    Massol J; Puech A; Boissel JP;
    Therapie; 2007; 62(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 18206104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance questionnaire for professionals fails to improve the quality of informed consent.
    Lavori PW; Wilt TJ; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):638-49. PubMed ID: 18042573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence summaries and synthesis: necessary but insufficient approach for determining clinical practice of integrated medicine?
    Coulter ID
    Integr Cancer Ther; 2006 Dec; 5(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 17101756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of decision aids: a review of the evidence.
    Leatherman S; Warrick L
    Med Care Res Rev; 2008 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):79S-116S. PubMed ID: 19015379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Criteria for evidence-based patient information].
    Steckelberg A; Berger B; Köpke S; Heesen C; Mühlhauser I
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2005; 99(6):343-51. PubMed ID: 16121649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The quality of evidence in health informatics: how did the quality of healthcare IT evaluation publications develop from 1982 to 2005?
    de Keizer NF; Ammenwerth E
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jan; 77(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17208040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of clinical decision making: models and current research.
    Banning M
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jan; 17(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 17331095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MATRIX - development and feasibility of a guide for quality assessment of patient decision aids.
    Lenz M; Kasper J
    Psychosoc Med; 2007 Aug; 4():Doc09. PubMed ID: 19742287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Striving for evidence in e-health evaluation: lessons from health technology assessment.
    Gagnon MP; Scott RE
    J Telemed Telecare; 2005; 11 Suppl 2():S34-6. PubMed ID: 16375790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reassessment of evidence synthesis of occupational medicine practice guidelines for interventional pain management.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Derby R; Schultz DM; Benyamin RM; Prager JP; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(4):393-482. PubMed ID: 18690276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based interventional pain management: principles, problems, potential and applications.
    Manchikanti L; Boswell MV; Giordano J
    Pain Physician; 2007 Mar; 10(2):329-56. PubMed ID: 17387356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.