335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16121866)
21. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?
Andolfi C; Adamic B; Oommen J; Gundeti MS
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31506749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned.
Kutikov A; Nguyen M; Guzzo T; Canter D; Casale P
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. PubMed ID: 17070302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.
Atug F; Woods M; Burgess SV; Castle EP; Thomas R
J Urol; 2005 Oct; 174(4 Pt 1):1440-2. PubMed ID: 16145459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pure single-site robot-assisted pyeloplasty with the da Vinci SP surgical system: Initial experience.
Heo JE; Kang SK; Koh DH; Na JC; Lee YS; Han WK; Choi YD; Jang WS
Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Jul; 60(4):326-330. PubMed ID: 31294143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.
Schwentner C; Pelzer A; Neururer R; Springer B; Horninger W; Bartsch G; Peschel R
BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):880-5. PubMed ID: 17535275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multi-institutional experience in infants.
Avery DI; Herbst KW; Lendvay TS; Noh PH; Dangle P; Gundeti MS; Steele MC; Corbett ST; Peters CA; Kim C
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Jun; 11(3):139.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26052000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without robotic assistance.
Bernie JE; Venkatesh R; Brown J; Gardner TA; Sundaram CP
JSLS; 2005; 9(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16121867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results.
Gettman MT; Peschel R; Neururer R; Bartsch G
Eur Urol; 2002 Nov; 42(5):453-7; discussion 457-8. PubMed ID: 12429153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is retroperitoneal approach feasible for robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: initial experience and long-term results.
Kaouk JH; Hafron J; Parekattil S; Moinzadeh A; Stein R; Gill IS; Hegarty N
J Endourol; 2008 Sep; 22(9):2153-9. PubMed ID: 18811572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.
Silay MS; Spinoit AF; Undre S; Fiala V; Tandogdu Z; Garmanova T; Guttilla A; Sancaktutar AA; Haid B; Waldert M; Goyal A; Serefoglu EC; Baldassarre E; Manzoni G; Radford A; Subramaniam R; Cherian A; Hoebeke P; Jacobs M; Rocco B; Yuriy R; Zattoni F; Kocvara R; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27346071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.
Dangle PP; Kearns J; Anderson B; Gundeti MS
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2221-6. PubMed ID: 23911637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The laparoscopic pyeloplasty: is there a role in the age of robotics?
Reddy MN; Nerli RB
Urol Clin North Am; 2015 Feb; 42(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 25455171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.
Lindgren BW; Hagerty J; Meyer T; Cheng EY
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 22819409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. One-port retroperitoneoscopic assisted pyeloplasty versus open dismembered pyeloplasty in young children: preliminary experience.
Caione P; Lais A; Nappo SG
J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):2109-15. PubMed ID: 20851429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL
Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty: a single surgical team experience with 38 cases.
Chiancone F; Fedelini M; Pucci L; Meccariello C; Fedelini P
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(3):512-517. PubMed ID: 28191792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys: technique and 1-year follow-up.
Chammas M; Feuillu B; Coissard A; Hubert J
BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 16469030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional experience.
Sivaraman A; Leveillee RJ; Patel MB; Chauhan S; Bracho JE; Moore CR; Coelho RF; Palmer KJ; Schatloff O; Bird VG; Munver R; Patel VR
Urology; 2012 Feb; 79(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 22173173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
