232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16121867)
1. Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without robotic assistance.
Bernie JE; Venkatesh R; Brown J; Gardner TA; Sundaram CP
JSLS; 2005; 9(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16121867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Initial experience with 3D vision laparoscopy and articulating shears.
Abou-Haidar H; Al-Qaoud T; Jednak R; Brzezinski A; El-Sherbiny M; Capolicchio JP
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):426.e1-426.e5. PubMed ID: 27889223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Weise ES; Winfield HN
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.
Patel V
Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15992879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children.
Baek M; Silay MS; Au JK; Huang GO; Elizondo RA; Puttmann KT; Janzen NK; Seth A; Roth DR; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Dec; 14(6):537.e1-537.e6. PubMed ID: 30007500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.
Palese MA; Munver R; Phillips CK; Dinlenc C; Stifelman M; DelPizzo JJ
JSLS; 2005; 9(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 16121866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.
Dangle PP; Kearns J; Anderson B; Gundeti MS
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2221-6. PubMed ID: 23911637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system.
Gettman MT; Neururer R; Bartsch G; Peschel R
Urology; 2002 Sep; 60(3):509-13. PubMed ID: 12350499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL
Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
Umari P; Lissiani A; Trombetta C; Belgrano E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modified Laparoscopic and Robotic Flap Pyeloplasty for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with a Long Proximal Ureteral Stricture: The "Wishbone" Anastomosis and the "Ureteral Plate" Technique.
Cheng S; Li X; Yang K; Xiong S; Li Z; Zhu H; Zhang P; Li X; Guan H; Li Z; Hao H; Zhang L; Li X; Zhou L
Urol Int; 2021; 105(7-8):642-649. PubMed ID: 33567431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?
Andolfi C; Adamic B; Oommen J; Gundeti MS
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31506749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of three dimensional and two dimentional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction].
Xu W; Li H; Ji Z; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Xiao H; Liu G
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 52(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 25573218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group.
Lucas SM; Sundaram CP; Wolf JS; Leveillee RJ; Bird VG; Aziz M; Pautler SE; Luke P; Erdeljan P; Baldwin DD; Ebrahimi K; Nadler RB; Rebuck D; Thomas R; Lee BR; Boylu U; Figenshau RS; Munver R; Averch TD; Gayed B; Shalhav AL; Gundeti MS; Castle EP; Anderson JK; Duffey BG; Landman J; Okhunov Z; Wong C; Strom KH
J Urol; 2012 Feb; 187(2):522-7. PubMed ID: 22177178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transition from open to robotic-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: a feasibility and outcome study.
O'Brien ST; Shukla AR
J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 21616719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
Singh I; Hemal AK
Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reoperative Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair in Children: Safety and Efficacy of the Technique.
Moscardi PR; Barbosa JA; Andrade HS; Mello MF; Cezarino BN; Oliveira LM; Srougi M; Dénes FT; Lopes RI
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):798-804. PubMed ID: 27789217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
