BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16123878)

  • 1. [Comments on the standards for acceptance and consistency testing of systems for digital radiography].
    Schätzl M; Braunschweig R; Hoppe T; Lenzen H; Schenk H; Schramm H; Streng W; von Volkmann T; Kamm KF
    Rofo; 2005 Sep; 177(9):1297-304. PubMed ID: 16123878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview.
    Dhaenens F
    JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis.
    Bolas A; Fitzgerald M
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The quality of digital mammograms. Development and use of phantoms for optimal safety].
    Schöfer H; Kotsianos D; Wirth S; Britsch S; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15747150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The current status of full-field digital mammography quality control.
    Williams MB; Goodale PJ; Butler PF
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):936-51. PubMed ID: 17411736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guideline for determining the mean glandular dose according to DIN 6868-162 and threshold contrast visibility according to the quality assurance guideline for digital mammography systems.
    Sommer A; Schopphoven S; Land I; Blaser D; Sobczak T;
    Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):474-81. PubMed ID: 24557600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality assurance in roentgen diagnosis. Comparison of constancy test methods according to DIN and IEC and practical consequences in Germany].
    Rassow J; Kütterer G; Neitzel U; Puschert W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 8924457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of the X-ray image: fault analysis.
    Brocklebank LM
    Dent Update; 1998 Jun; 25(5):188-90, 192-4. PubMed ID: 18170953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display.
    Krupinski EA; Williams MB; Andriole K; Strauss KJ; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA; ; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 17544140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Krupinski EA; Strauss KJ; Breeden WK; Rzeszotarski MS; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):371-88. PubMed ID: 17544139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital radiography].
    Oppelt A
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():523-4. PubMed ID: 9517266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Acceptance test of film processing in roentgen diagnosis].
    Hoeschen D; Buhr E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):203-5. PubMed ID: 8924456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiologic equipment.
    Yester MV
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Apr; 3(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 2049272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance.
    Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R
    J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital mammography image quality: image display.
    Siegel E; Krupinski E; Samei E; Flynn M; Andriole K; Erickson B; Thomas J; Badano A; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27. PubMed ID: 17412136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Image quality assurance in x-ray diagnostic units. Information on DIN 6868 standard series].
    Becker-Gaab C; Borcke E; Bunde E; Hagemann G; Kütterer G; Lang GR; Schöfer H; Stender HS; Stieve FE; von Volkmann T
    Radiologe; 1985 Nov; 25(11):529-33. PubMed ID: 4089168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems for screening within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
    Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):539-48. PubMed ID: 18374533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.