388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16123878)
1. [Comments on the standards for acceptance and consistency testing of systems for digital radiography].
Schätzl M; Braunschweig R; Hoppe T; Lenzen H; Schenk H; Schramm H; Streng W; von Volkmann T; Kamm KF
Rofo; 2005 Sep; 177(9):1297-304. PubMed ID: 16123878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview.
Dhaenens F
JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis.
Bolas A; Fitzgerald M
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The quality of digital mammograms. Development and use of phantoms for optimal safety].
Schöfer H; Kotsianos D; Wirth S; Britsch S; Reiser M
Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15747150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The current status of full-field digital mammography quality control.
Williams MB; Goodale PJ; Butler PF
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):936-51. PubMed ID: 17411736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guideline for determining the mean glandular dose according to DIN 6868-162 and threshold contrast visibility according to the quality assurance guideline for digital mammography systems.
Sommer A; Schopphoven S; Land I; Blaser D; Sobczak T;
Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):474-81. PubMed ID: 24557600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Quality assurance in roentgen diagnosis. Comparison of constancy test methods according to DIN and IEC and practical consequences in Germany].
Rassow J; Kütterer G; Neitzel U; Puschert W
Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 8924457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The quality of the X-ray image: fault analysis.
Brocklebank LM
Dent Update; 1998 Jun; 25(5):188-90, 192-4. PubMed ID: 18170953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display.
Krupinski EA; Williams MB; Andriole K; Strauss KJ; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA; ; ;
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 17544140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artifacts in digital mammography.
Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
Williams MB; Krupinski EA; Strauss KJ; Breeden WK; Rzeszotarski MS; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):371-88. PubMed ID: 17544139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Digital radiography].
Oppelt A
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():523-4. PubMed ID: 9517266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Acceptance test of film processing in roentgen diagnosis].
Hoeschen D; Buhr E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):203-5. PubMed ID: 8924456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiologic equipment.
Yester MV
Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Apr; 3(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 2049272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance.
Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R
J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital mammography image quality: image display.
Siegel E; Krupinski E; Samei E; Flynn M; Andriole K; Erickson B; Thomas J; Badano A; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27. PubMed ID: 17412136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Image quality assurance in x-ray diagnostic units. Information on DIN 6868 standard series].
Becker-Gaab C; Borcke E; Bunde E; Hagemann G; Kütterer G; Lang GR; Schöfer H; Stender HS; Stieve FE; von Volkmann T
Radiologe; 1985 Nov; 25(11):529-33. PubMed ID: 4089168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems for screening within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):539-48. PubMed ID: 18374533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]