167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16124971)
1. Influence of cement viscosity and cement mantle thickness on migration of the Exeter total hip prosthesis.
Nelissen RG; Garling EH; Valstar ER
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 16124971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cemented all-polyethylene acetabular cup: factors affecting survival with emphasis on the integrated polyethylene spacer: an analysis of the effect of cement spacers, cement mantle thickness, and acetabular angle on the survival of total hip arthroplasty.
Faris PM; Ritter MA; Keating EM; Thong AE; Davis KE; Meding JB
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Feb; 21(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 16520206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Good diagnostic performance of early migration as a predictor of late aseptic loosening of acetabular cups: results from ten years of follow-up with Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA).
Nieuwenhuijse MJ; Valstar ER; Kaptein BL; Nelissen RG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(10):874-80. PubMed ID: 22617914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computational assessment of the effect of polyethylene wear rate, mantle thickness, and porosity on the mechanical failure of the acetabular cement mantle.
Coultrup OJ; Hunt C; Wroblewski BM; Taylor M
J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19950359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Early primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in elderly patients].
Simko P; Braunsteiner T; Vajcziková S
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 17026887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing.
Little JP; Gray HA; Murray DW; Beard DJ; Gill HS
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 18358388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.
Zwartelé RE; Olsthoorn PG; Pöll RG; Brand R; Doets HC
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18758793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty using rough and smooth surface femoral stems with similar design: 10-year survivorship of 48 cases.
Datir SP; Wynn-Jones CH
Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 16470434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of stem geometry on stresses within the distal cement mantle in total hip replacement.
Schmölz W; Gordon DR; Shields AJ; Kirkwood D; Grigoris P
Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 10942992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: a cadaver model with simulated blood flow.
Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA; Higham PA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):607-16. PubMed ID: 16929438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acetabular cement mantles and component position: are we achieving "ideal" results?
Sandhu HS; Martin WN; Bishay M; Pozo JL
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):841-5. PubMed ID: 16950036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Loosening of the cemented hip prosthesis. The importance of heat injury.
Mjöberg B
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1986; 221():1-40. PubMed ID: 3468743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement: repeated DXA studies in 96 hips randomized to 3 types of fixation.
Digas G; Kärrholm J; Thanner J
Acta Orthop; 2006 Apr; 77(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 16752282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of bone cement viscosity and set time on mantle area in total knee arthroplasty.
Kopec M; Milbrandt JC; Kohut N; Kern B; Allan DG
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Oct; 38(10):519-22. PubMed ID: 20011741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Boneloc bone-cement: experience in hip arthroplasty during a 3-year period.
Abdel-Kader KF; Allcock S; Walker DI; Chaudhry SB
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Oct; 16(7):811-9. PubMed ID: 11607895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
Cross M; Bostrom M
Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of initial pressurization and cup introduction time on the depth of cement penetration in an acetabular model.
Abdulghani S; Wang JS; McCarthy I; Flivik G
Acta Orthop; 2007 Jun; 78(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 17611845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
