226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16124980)
1. Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Negus R; Gedroyc W; Darzi AW
Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):980-9. PubMed ID: 16124980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy.
Rosman AS; Korsten MA
Am J Med; 2007 Mar; 120(3):203-210.e4. PubMed ID: 17349438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance colonography vs computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: an indirect comparison.
Purkayastha S; Athanasiou T; Tekkis PP; Constantinides V; Teare J; Darzi AW
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Feb; 9(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 17223933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer--a prospective trial of 150 patients.
White TJ; Avery GR; Kennan N; Syed AM; Hartley JE; Monson JR
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Feb; 11(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18462241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.
Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Carbone I; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Di Giulio E; Schillaci A; Passariello R
Endoscopy; 2002 Jun; 34(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 12048624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.
Graser A; Melzer A; Lindner E; Nagel D; Herrmann K; Stieber P; Schirra J; Mansmann U; Reiser MF; Göke B; Kolligs FT
Gastroenterology; 2013 Apr; 144(4):743-750.e2. PubMed ID: 23415805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dark lumen MR colonography: can high spatial resolution VIBE imaging improve the detection of colorectal masses?
Ajaj W; Rühm SG; Papanikolaou N; Lauenstein TC; Gerken G; Goyen M
Rofo; 2006 Nov; 178(11):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17128377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.
Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy.
Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Adamek HE; Jakobs R; Pfeifer B; Eickhoff A; Zindel C; Riemann JF; Layer G
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 16304088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of small colorectal lesions: a prospective comparative study.
Pohl J; Nguyen-Tat M; Pech O; May A; Rabenstein T; Ell C
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Mar; 103(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 18070234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention?
Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Goehde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 14745756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic precision of fecal calprotectin for inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal malignancy.
von Roon AC; Karamountzos L; Purkayastha S; Reese GE; Darzi AW; Teare JP; Paraskeva P; Tekkis PP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Apr; 102(4):803-13. PubMed ID: 17324124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colonoscopy and multidetector-array computed-tomographic colonography: detection rates and feasibility.
Ginnerup Pedersen B; Christiansen TE; Bjerregaard NC; Ljungmann K; Laurberg S
Endoscopy; 2003 Sep; 35(9):736-42. PubMed ID: 12929020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of the circumferential margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Tilney HS; Darzi AW; Heriot AG
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jun; 9(5):402-11. PubMed ID: 17504336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of colonic masses with MR colonography.
Haykir R; Karaköse S; Karabacakoğlu A; Kayaçetin E; Sahin M
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 17(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16941252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Air-inflated magnetic resonance colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy: Comparison with intraoperative findings, pathology specimens, and follow-up conventional colonoscopy.
Wong TY; Lam WW; So NM; Lee JF; Leung KL
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 17100979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is virtual bronchoscopy an efficient diagnostic tool for the thoracic surgeon?
Jones CM; Athanasiou T
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jan; 79(1):365-74. PubMed ID: 15620990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection.
Ajaj W; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Goyen M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1088-94. PubMed ID: 17031836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative evaluation of synchronous colorectal cancer using MR colonography.
Achiam MP; Holst Andersen LP; Klein M; Chabanova E; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):790-7. PubMed ID: 19375956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.
Chiu HM; Chang CY; Chen CC; Lee YC; Wu MS; Lin JT; Shun CT; Wang HP
Gut; 2007 Mar; 56(3):373-9. PubMed ID: 17005766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
