These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16125761)

  • 1. The effectiveness of a community outreach intervention to improve follow-up among underserved women at highest risk for cervical cancer.
    Engelstad LP; Stewart S; Otero-Sabogal R; Leung MS; Davis PI; Pasick RJ
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):741-8. PubMed ID: 16125761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Buehler SK; Parsons WL
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of interventions to improve follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening.
    Yabroff KR; Kerner JF; Mandelblatt JS
    Prev Med; 2000 Oct; 31(4):429-39. PubMed ID: 11006069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
    Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Encouraging underscreened women to have cervical cancer screening: the effectiveness of a computer strategy.
    Campbell E; Peterkin D; Abbott R; Rogers J
    Prev Med; 1997; 26(6):801-7. PubMed ID: 9388791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adherence to cervical and breast cancer programs is crucial to improving screening performance.
    Mauad EC; Nicolau SM; Moreira LF; Haikel RL; Longatto-Filho A; Baracat EC
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1241. PubMed ID: 19778158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Papanicolaou testing among Vietnamese Americans: results of a multifaceted intervention.
    Nguyen TT; McPhee SJ; Gildengorin G; Nguyen T; Wong C; Lai KQ; Lam H; Mock J; Luong TN; Bui-Tong N; Ha-Iaconis T
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Jul; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16777536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase screening in HMO women overdue for Pap test and mammography services.
    Lynch FL; Whitlock EP; Valanis BG; Smith SK
    Prev Med; 2004 Apr; 38(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 15020173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of ASC-H terminology on the detection of HSILs in medically underserved California women.
    Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Feb; 37(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 19021201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The costs of an outreach intervention for low-income women with abnormal Pap smears.
    Wagner TH; Engelstad LP; McPhee SJ; Pasick RJ
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2007 Jan; 4(1):A11. PubMed ID: 17173719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a minimal self-help smoking cessation intervention following cervical cancer screening.
    McBride CM; Scholes D; Grothaus LC; Curry SJ; Ludman E; Albright J
    Prev Med; 1999 Aug; 29(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 10446040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a community outreach service with opportunity screening for cervical cancer using Pap smears.
    Chang HC; Hsiung HY; Chen SI; Yen AM; Chen TH
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2007 Jun; 29(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 17389674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
    Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Health is strength": a community health education program to improve breast and cervical cancer screening among Korean American Women in Alameda County, California.
    Moskowitz JM; Kazinets G; Wong JM; Tager IB
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2007; 31(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 17418978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abnormal Pap screening among Mexican-American women: impediments to receiving and reporting follow-up care.
    Hunt LM; de Voogd KB; Akana LL; Browner CH
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1998; 25(10):1743-9. PubMed ID: 9826840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal pap tests.
    Eggleston KS; Coker AL; Das IP; Cordray ST; Luchok KJ
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007 Apr; 16(3):311-30. PubMed ID: 17439377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective cervical cytology screening programmes in middle-income countries: the Chilean experience.
    Sepúlveda C; Prado R
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2005; 29(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 16188399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What predicts adherence to follow-up recommendations for abnormal Pap tests among older women?
    Coker AL; Eggleston KS; Meyer TE; Luchok K; Das IP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17157363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.