These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16125775)

  • 21. Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Laybourn P
    Med Sci Law; 2017 Oct; 57(4):211-219. PubMed ID: 28992745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: emotional bias and juror nullification.
    Horowitz IA; Kerr NL; Park ES; Gockel C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16786405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. When does quality count?: Perceptions of hearsay testimony about child sexual abuse interviews.
    Buck JA; Warrren AR; Brigham JC
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):599-621. PubMed ID: 15732649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. News media reporting on civil litigation and its influence on civil justice decision making.
    Robbennolt JK; Studebaker CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 12647465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sexual harassment stories: testing a story-mediated model of juror decision-making in civil litigation.
    Huntley JE; Costanzo M
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):29-51. PubMed ID: 12647466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?
    Henderson KS; Levett LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):638-649. PubMed ID: 27243361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reality check: a comparison of college students and a community sample of mock jurors in a simulated sexual violent predator civil commitment.
    McCabe JG; Krauss DA; Lieberman JD
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):730-50. PubMed ID: 19856483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Juror competence in civil trials: effects of preinstruction and evidence technicality.
    ForsterLee L; Horowitz IA; Bourgeois MJ
    J Appl Psychol; 1993 Feb; 78(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 8449852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Association between civil procedure and medical malpractice litigation in Japan.
    Hagihara A; Nishi M; Nobutomo K
    Med Law; 2004; 23(2):269-88. PubMed ID: 15270470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of two forms of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases.
    Redlich AD; Myers JE; Goodman GS; Qin J
    Child Maltreat; 2002 Nov; 7(4):312-28. PubMed ID: 12408244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deciding the fate of others: the cognitive underpinnings of racially biased juror decision making.
    Kleider HM; Knuycky LR; Cavrak SE
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(3):175-93. PubMed ID: 24837019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Juror reactions to jury duty: perceptions of the system and potential stressors.
    Bornstein BH; Miller MK; Nemeth RJ; Page GL; Musil S
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(3):321-46. PubMed ID: 15968710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.
    Ruva CL; McEvoy C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
    Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors?
    Jung S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():37-42. PubMed ID: 26294081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What Evidence Matters to Jurors? The Prevalence and Importance of Different Homicide Trial Evidence to Mock Jurors.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(3):437-451. PubMed ID: 31984031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors' application of instructions.
    Baguley CM; McKimmie BM; Masser BM
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):284-304. PubMed ID: 28182459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How old is old in allegations of age discrimination? The limitations of existing law.
    Wiener RL; Farnum KS
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):536-50. PubMed ID: 27227275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity.
    Keller SR; Wiener RL
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):376-94. PubMed ID: 21766327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.