These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Adhesion between copper-plated acrylic tray resin and a polysulfide rubber impression material. Shigeto N; Kawazoe Y; Hamada T; Yamada S J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Aug; 42(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 379322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I. Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tear and energy properties of three impression materials. Hondrum SO Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 7748444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fine detail reproduction of very high viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials. Chee WW; Donovan TE Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 2700631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Working times of elastomeric impression materials according to dimensional stability and detail reproduction. Tan E; Chai J Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 8595114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A study of the "thixotropic" property of elastomeric impression materials. Chai J; Pang IC Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 8003196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Interaction of gloves and rubber dam with a poly(vinyl siloxane) impression material: a screening test. Kahn RL; Donovan TE; Chee WW Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 2638846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A study of impression tray adhesives. Samman JM; Fletcher A Quintessence Int; 1985 Apr; 16(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 3892569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A simplified reliable impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Pameijer CH J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1983 Oct; 57(4):159-60. PubMed ID: 6421899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dual-arch and custom tray impression accuracy. Davis RD; Schwartz RS Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 1854447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Adhesion of polysulfide rubber impression material to dental metals (author's transl)]. Kawai T; Iwata T; Nishimoto K; Aida Y; Aoki Y; Yamauchi M; Hasegawa J Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1982 Jan; 23(61):40-6. PubMed ID: 7042866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The bonding properties of elastomer tray adhesives. Davis GB; Moser JB; Brinsden GI J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Sep; 36(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 784960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An effect of tray design and material retention on the linear dimensional changes in polysulfide impressions. Walters RA; Spurrier S J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 2407824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The laminar impression technique. Schoenrock GA J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):392-5. PubMed ID: 2685238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing effects of tray treatment on the accuracy of dies. Tjan AH; Whang SB J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Aug; 58(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 3305883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]