160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16126117)
1. A comparison of the monofilament with other testing modalities for foot ulcer susceptibility.
Miranda-Palma B; Sosenko JM; Bowker JH; Mizel MS; Boulton AJ
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 70(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 16126117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between monofilament, tuning fork and vibration perception tests for screening patients at risk of foot complication.
Gin H; Rigalleau V; Baillet L; Rabemanantsoa C
Diabetes Metab; 2002 Dec; 28(6 Pt 1):457-61. PubMed ID: 12522325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An alternative to a 10-g monofilament or tuning fork? Two new, simple, easy-to-use screening tests for determining foot ulcer risk in people with diabetes.
Baker N
Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1477-9. PubMed ID: 22686252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Possible sources of discrepancies in the use of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Impact on prevalence of insensate foot and workload requirements.
McGill M; Molyneaux L; Spencer R; Heng LF; Yue DK
Diabetes Care; 1999 Apr; 22(4):598-602. PubMed ID: 10189538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vibration perception threshold: are multiple sites of testing superior to single site testing on diabetic foot examination?
Armstrong DG; Hussain SK; Middleton J; Peters EJ; Wunderlich RP; Lavery LA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 May; 44(5):70-4, 76. PubMed ID: 9697548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Examination of peripheral sensibility. Vibration test is more sensitive than monofilament test].
Sörman E; Edwall LL
Lakartidningen; 2002 Mar; 99(12):1339-40. PubMed ID: 11998167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of a new device in the assessment of peripheral sensory neuropathy in diabetes.
Bracewell N; Game F; Jeffcoate W; Scammell BE
Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1553-5. PubMed ID: 22672257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different screening tests for detecting diabetic foot neuropathy.
Forouzandeh F; Aziz Ahari A; Abolhasani F; Larijani B
Acta Neurol Scand; 2005 Dec; 112(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 16281925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting ulcer-free survival using the discriminative value of screening test locations.
Rinkel WD; van der Oest MJW; Dijkstra DA; Castro Cabezas M; Coert JH
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2019 Mar; 35(3):e3119. PubMed ID: 30575290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of clinical tools and their diagnostic use in distal symmetric polyneuropathy.
Pourhamidi K; Dahlin LB; Englund E; Rolandsson O
Prim Care Diabetes; 2014 Apr; 8(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23664849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Isolated use of vibration perception thresholds and semmes-weinstein monofilament in diagnosing diabetic polyneuropathy: "the North Catalonia diabetes study".
Jurado J; Ybarra J; Pou JM
Nurs Clin North Am; 2007 Mar; 42(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 17270590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening.
Kamei N; Yamane K; Nakanishi S; Yamashita Y; Tamura T; Ohshita K; Watanabe H; Fujikawa R; Okubo M; Kohno N
J Diabetes Complications; 2005; 19(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15642490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and responsiveness of an 18 site, 10-g monofilament examination for assessment of protective foot sensation.
Young D; Schuerman S; Flynn K; Hartig K; Moss D; Altenburger B
J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2011; 34(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 21937899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The tuning fork and the at-risk foot.
Hitman GA
Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1477. PubMed ID: 23151034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Examination of tactile disorders in diabetic patients and cooperation with a neurologist].
Jirkovská A; Boucek P
Vnitr Lek; 2007 May; 53(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 17642430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neuropathic and ischemic changes of the foot in Brazilian patients with diabetes.
Muniz EC; Rocha RM; Reis ML; Santos VL; Grossi SA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):60-70, 72-3. PubMed ID: 14631664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monofilament assessment of neuropathy in a community diabetes clinic.
Rheeder P; van Wyk JT; Hokken JW; Hueting HM
S Afr Med J; 2002 Sep; 92(9):715-9. PubMed ID: 12382357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with use of the clanging tuning fork test.
Oyer DS; Saxon D; Shah A
Endocr Pract; 2007; 13(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17360294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The utility of Vibratip in accurate identification of loss of protective sensation in the contralateral foot of patients admitted with a diabetic foot ulcer.
Pasangha E; George B; Jayalakshmi V; Devi P; Ayyar V; Bantwal G
Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2021; 15(3):857-862. PubMed ID: 33873055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Monofilament test in diabetic neuropathy].
Valkonen O; Erkinjuntti M; Falck B; Rönnemaa T
Duodecim; 2000; 116(19):2119-25. PubMed ID: 12017733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
