329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16126331)
1. Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: a prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters.
Stensballe J; Looms D; Nielsen PN; Tvede M
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):978-83. PubMed ID: 16126331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomised parallel comparative trial.
De Ridder DJ; Everaert K; Fernández LG; Valero JV; Durán AB; Abrisqueta ML; Ventura MG; Sotillo AR
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):991-5. PubMed ID: 16137822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study.
Sarica S; Akkoc Y; Karapolat H; Aktug H
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2010 Dec; 46(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20445490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.
Vapnek JM; Maynard FM; Kim J
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):994-8. PubMed ID: 12576829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: long-term followup of a hydrophilic low friction technique.
Waller L; Jonsson O; Norlén L; Sullivan L
J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 7815579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Patient satisfaction with two different types of bladder catheters].
Litherland AT; Aas MS; Schiøtz HA
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 16415935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intermittent catheterization with a hydrophilic-coated catheter delays urinary tract infections in acute spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.
Cardenas DD; Moore KN; Dannels-McClure A; Scelza WM; Graves DE; Brooks M; Busch AK
PM R; 2011 May; 3(5):408-17. PubMed ID: 21570027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient-perceived discomfort with two coated urinary catheters.
Litherland AT; Schiøtz HA
Br J Nurs; 2007 Mar 8-21; 16(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 17505374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review.
Schumm K; Lam TB
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(8):738-46. PubMed ID: 18951451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Residual urine after intermittent catheterization in females using two different catheters.
Biering-Sørensen F; Hansen HV; Nielsen PN; Looms D
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2007; 41(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 17763228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intermittent catheterization with hydrophilic catheters as a treatment of chronic neurogenic urinary retention.
Chartier-Kastler E; Denys P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Jan; 30(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 20928913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective, randomized, crossover, multicenter study comparing quality of life using compact versus standard catheters for intermittent self-catheterization.
Chartier-Kastler E; Amarenco G; Lindbo L; Soljanik I; Andersen HL; Bagi P; Gjødsbøl K; Domurath B
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):942-7. PubMed ID: 23587630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient experience with hydrophilic catheters used in clean intermittent catheterization.
Taskinen S; Fagerholm R; Ruutu M
J Pediatr Urol; 2008 Oct; 4(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 18790422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric catheter.
Sutherland RS; Kogan BA; Baskin LS; Mevorach RA
J Urol; 1996 Dec; 156(6):2041-3. PubMed ID: 8911385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Urethral cytology in spinal cord injury patients performing intermittent catheterisation.
Vaidyanathan S; Soni BM; Dundas S; Krishnan KR
Paraplegia; 1994 Jul; 32(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 7970852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of osmolality in hydrophilic urethral catheters: a crossover study.
Waller L; Telander M; Sullivan L
Spinal Cord; 1997 Apr; 35(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 9143085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intermittent catheterization with a prelubricated catheter in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomized crossover study.
Giannantoni A; Di Stasi SM; Scivoletto G; Virgili G; Dolci S; Porena M
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):130-3. PubMed ID: 11435839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The importance of osmolality for intermittent catheterization of the urethra.
Lundgren J; Bengtsson O; Israelsson A; Jönsson AC; Lindh AS; Utas J
Spinal Cord; 2000 Jan; 38(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 10762197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blind urethral catheterization in trauma patients suffering from lower urinary tract injuries.
Shlamovitz GZ; McCullough L
J Trauma; 2007 Feb; 62(2):330-5; discussion 334-5. PubMed ID: 17297322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient satisfaction and the LoFric catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.
Diokno AC; Mitchell BA; Nash AJ; Kimbrough JA
J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):349-51. PubMed ID: 7815580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
