305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16126923)
1. Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement.
Ko JP; Chang J; Bomsztyk E; Babb JS; Naidich DP; Rusinek H
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 16126923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wavelet compression of low-dose chest CT data: effect on lung nodule detection.
Ko JP; Rusinek H; Naidich DP; McGuinness G; Rubinowitz AN; Leitman BS; Martino JM
Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 12775850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality.
Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of subsolid nodules: Evaluation of a commercial CAD system.
Benzakoun J; Bommart S; Coste J; Chassagnon G; Lederlin M; Boussouar S; Revel MP
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1728-1734. PubMed ID: 27666609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images.
Bajpai V; Lee KH; Kim B; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Kang HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W38-43. PubMed ID: 18647884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of blood vessels on measurement of nodule volume in a chest phantom.
Ko JP; Marcus R; Bomsztyk E; Babb JS; Stefanescu C; Kaur M; Naidich DP; Rusinek H
Radiology; 2006 Apr; 239(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 16567484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality.
Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Bankier AA; Weber M; Prokop M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 16868278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Volumetric measurement pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules with multi-detector CT: effect of various tube current on measurement accuracy--a chest CT phantom study.
Linning E; Daqing M
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):934-9. PubMed ID: 19409818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT screening and follow-up of lung nodules: effects of tube current-time setting and nodule size and density on detectability and of tube current-time setting on apparent size.
Christe A; Torrente JC; Lin M; Yen A; Hallett R; Roychoudhury K; Schmitzberger F; Vock P; Roos J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):623-30. PubMed ID: 21862804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pulmonary nodules: Interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT-- influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance.
Gietema HA; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Mali WP; Groenewegen G; Prokop M
Radiology; 2007 Dec; 245(3):888-94. PubMed ID: 17923508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection of solid lung nodules in lossy compressed multidetector computed tomography chest exams.
Raffy P; Gaudeau Y; Miller DP; Moureaux JM; Castellino RA
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1194-203. PubMed ID: 16979068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Persistent pure ground-glass nodules in the lung: interscan variability of semiautomated volume and attenuation measurements.
Park CM; Goo JM; Lee HJ; Kim KG; Kang MJ; Shin YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):W408-14. PubMed ID: 21098172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of lung volume on nodule size on CT.
Petkovska I; Brown MS; Goldin JG; Kim HJ; McNitt-Gray MF; Abtin FG; Ghurabi RJ; Aberle DR
Acad Radiol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):476-85. PubMed ID: 17368218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimum perceivable size difference: how well can radiologists visually detect a change in lung nodule size from CT images?
Solomon J; Ebner L; Christe A; Peters A; Munz J; Löbelenz L; Klaus J; Richards T; Samei E; Roos JE
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):1947-1955. PubMed ID: 32997175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Richter T; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Seo J
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 19378744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of JPEG and wavelet compression of spiral low-dose ct images on detection of small lung cancers.
Li F; Sone S; Takashima S; Kiyono K; Yang ZG; Hasegawa M; Kawakami S; Saito A; Hanamura K; Asakura K
Acta Radiol; 2001 Mar; 42(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 11259942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection.
Rubin GD; Lyo JK; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Chow LC; Leung AN; Mindelzun R; Schraedley-Desmond PK; Zinck SE; Naidich DP; Napel S
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):274-83. PubMed ID: 15537839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided volumetry of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity at MDCT.
Oda S; Awai K; Murao K; Ozawa A; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Yamashita Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):398-406. PubMed ID: 20093602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The LoG characteristic scale: a consistent measurement of lung nodule size in CT imaging.
Diciotti S; Lombardo S; Coppini G; Grassi L; Falchini M; Mascalchi M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):397-409. PubMed ID: 20129846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pulmonary Nodules: growth rate assessment in patients by using serial CT and three-dimensional volumetry.
Ko JP; Berman EJ; Kaur M; Babb JS; Bomsztyk E; Greenberg AK; Naidich DP; Rusinek H
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):662-71. PubMed ID: 22156993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
