These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16127845)
1. The religious response to reproductive technology. Greil AL Christ Century; 1989 Jan 4-11; 106(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 16127845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Jews and Evangelicals take differing stands. Goldman AL N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11646549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproduction in Jewish law. Sinclair DB Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):71-106. PubMed ID: 15868663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A response to the Vatican document on IVF and related issues. Overduin DCh Lutheran Theol J; 1987 Aug; 21(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 11658932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproductive technologies: where are we headed? McCormick RA Loyola Law Rev; 1999; 45(2):269-85. PubMed ID: 16622957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Technology and the womb. Ostling RN Time; 1987 Mar; 129(12):58-9. PubMed ID: 11653769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproduction--Islamic views on the science of procreation. Ahmad NH Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2003 Mar; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 17117542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rules for making love and babies. Woodward KL; Cohn B; Springen K Newsweek; 1987 Mar; 109(12):42-3. PubMed ID: 11649854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Does bioethics provide answers?: Secular and religious bioethics and our procreative future. Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 2004-2005; 35(3):473-517. PubMed ID: 16715560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A biblical response to baby-making: surrogacy, artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. McColley D J Biblic Ethics Med; 1991; 5(3):45-8. PubMed ID: 11659522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A womb of one's own. Stark E Psychol Today; 1985 Jan; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 11653635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial techniques of procreation: legal and moral aspects. Shifman P Isr Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):600-9. PubMed ID: 14682331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New reproductive technologies: Protestant modes of thought. Meilaender G Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1637-46. PubMed ID: 11653384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Of embryos and empire. Cohen E New Atlantis; 2003; (2):3-16. PubMed ID: 15584196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Religious traditions and embryo science. Jones DG; Whitaker MI Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):41-3. PubMed ID: 19882457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Islamic viewpoint on new assisted reproductive technologies. Fadel HE Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 15868666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The birds, the bees, and the deep freeze: is there international consensus in the debate over assisted reproductive technologies? Pitrolo EA Houst J Int Law; 1996; 19(1):147-206. PubMed ID: 12666682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ethics of the new reproductive technologies. Schiedermayer DL Christ Med Soc J; 1988; 19(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11649258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]