413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16127862)
1. Biotechnology: a challenge for Hippocrates.
Huynen S
Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1991; 6(4):534-51. PubMed ID: 16127862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Proprietary rights in body parts: the relevance of Moore's case in Australia.
Mortimer D
Monash Univ Law Rev; 1993; 19(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 17333577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: patients, property rights, and public policy.
Biagi KG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1991; 35(2):433-62. PubMed ID: 16144099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A question of property rights in the human body.
Marusyk RW; Swain MS
Ottawa Law Rev; 1989; 21(2):351-86. PubMed ID: 16086463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient autonomy and biomedical research: judicial compromise in Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
LoBiondo AR
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():277-305. PubMed ID: 16281328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Property, progeny, and patents.
Knowles LP
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):38-40. PubMed ID: 10321342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward the right of commerciality: recognizing property rights in the commercial value of human tissue.
Hardiman R
UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):207-64. PubMed ID: 11659048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Living tissue and organ donors and property law: more on Moore.
Dickens BM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():73-93. PubMed ID: 10183665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Who deserves the patent pot of gold?: an inquiry into the proper inventorship of patient-based discoveries.
Ho CM
DePaul J Health Care Law; 2004; 7(2):185-243. PubMed ID: 15675072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond Moore: issues of law and policy impacting human cell and genetic research in the age of biotechnology.
Hartman RG
J Leg Med; 1993 Sep; 14(3):463-77. PubMed ID: 7779167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Owning the secret of life: biotechnology and property rights revisited.
Yelpaala K
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):111-219. PubMed ID: 15709267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biotechnology and the new property regime in human bodies and body parts.
Nwabueze RN
Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 2002 Jan; 24(1):19-64. PubMed ID: 12769112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Taking the least of you: most of us have tissue or blood samples on file somewhere, whether we know it or not. What we don't typically know is what research they are being used for or how much money is being made from them. And science may want to keep things that way.
Skloot R
N Y Times Mag; 2006 Apr; ():38-45, 75, 79, 81. PubMed ID: 16715570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Surpassing the material: the human rights implications of informed consent in bioprospecting cells derived from indigenous people groups.
Wu AO
Wash Univ Law Q; 2000; 78(3):979-1003. PubMed ID: 16273699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Body of research--ownership and use of human tissue.
Charo RA
N Engl J Med; 2006 Oct; 355(15):1517-9. PubMed ID: 17035644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward a just model of alienability of human tissue.
Budds B
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 2003; 37(3):757-82. PubMed ID: 16514784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
Potts J
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 86(2):453-96. PubMed ID: 11659500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Tissue banks trigger worry about ownership issues.
Schmidt C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Sep; 98(17):1174-5. PubMed ID: 16954465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cells, sales, and royalties: the patient's right to a portion of the profits.
Danforth MT
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1988; 6(1):179-202. PubMed ID: 11650242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Who owns the body? On the ethics of using human tissues for commercial purposes.
Murray TH
IRB; 1986; 8(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
