BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16127877)

  • 1. The Davis dilemma: how to prevent battles over frozen preembryos.
    Panitch AR
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1991; 41(2):543-79. PubMed ID: 16127877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes.
    Muller RJ
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sign on the dotted line: enforceability of signed agreements, upon divorce of the married couple, concerning the disposition of their frozen preembryos.
    Rosado M
    New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(4):1041-75. PubMed ID: 15162814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disputes over frozen embryos: who wins, who loses, and how do we decide?--An analysis of Davis v. Davis, York v. Jones, and state statutes affecting reproductive choices.
    Ahnen CD
    Creighton Law Rev; 1991 Jun; 24(4):1299-357. PubMed ID: 16130262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
    Cuva AJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conundrums with penumbras: the right to privacy encompasses non-gamete providers who create preembryos with the intent to become parents.
    Dillon LM
    Wash Law Rev; 2003 May; 78(2):625-51. PubMed ID: 15378817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deciding custody of frozen embryos: many eggs are frozen but who is chosen?
    Malo PE
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999-2000; 3():307-34. PubMed ID: 15929238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Halakhic approaches to the resolution of disputes concerning the disposition of preembryos.
    Breitowitz YA
    Tradition; 1996; 31(1):64-91. PubMed ID: 11654662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
    Trespalacios MJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
    Pachman TS
    Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro fertilization and the right to procreate: the right to no.
    Sieck WA
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1998 Dec; 147(2):435-85. PubMed ID: 16514780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. My egg, your sperm, whose preembryo? A proposal for deciding which party receives custody of frozen preembryos.
    Katz DA
    Va J Soc Policy Law; 1998; 5(3):623-74. PubMed ID: 11979606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procreative liberty and contemporaneous choice: an inalienable rights approach to frozen embryo disputes.
    Coleman CH
    Minn Law Rev; 1999 Nov; 84(1):55-127. PubMed ID: 16514764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disposition of cryopreserved preembryos after divorce.
    Windsor KH
    Iowa Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 88(4):1001-34. PubMed ID: 15214352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dealing with cryopreserved embryos upon divorce: a contractual approach aimed at preserving party expectations.
    Petersen SD
    UCLA Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 50(4):1065-93. PubMed ID: 15378819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-vitro fertilization, frozen embryos, and the right to privacy--are mandatory donation laws constitutional?
    Schaefer K
    Pac Law J; 1990 Oct; 22(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 16047419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Navigating the slippery slope of frozen embryo disputes: the case for a contractual approach.
    Fleming NA
    Temple Law Rev; 2002; 75(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 15156893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From a to z: analysis of Massachusetts' approach to the enforceability of cryopreserved pre-embryo dispositional agreements.
    Kaplan S
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 81(5):1093-118. PubMed ID: 12715818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce.
    King M
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1999 Fall-2000 Spring; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.