568 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16128312)
1. Legal. Legal experiments.
Haugh R
Hosp Health Netw; 2005 Jul; 79(7):20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 16128312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seeking shelter from rising malpractice costs.
Norland S
Healthc Financ Manage; 2003 Nov; 57(11):58-64. PubMed ID: 14626706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. When attorneys come back for seconds. Increased attorney fees for extraordinary work in medical malpractice cases.
Kemp R
J Leg Med; 2004 Mar; 25(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 15204915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical errors, medical negligence, and professional medical liability reform.
Rosenbaum S
Public Health Rep; 2003; 118(3):272-4. PubMed ID: 12766221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An economic assessment of damage caps in medical malpractice litigation imposed by state laws and the implications for federal policy and law.
Frech HE; Hamm WG; Wazzan CP
Health Matrix Clevel; 2006; 16(2):693-722. PubMed ID: 16948253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An empirical examination of the equal protection challenge to contingency fee restrictions in medical malpractice reform statutes.
Dwyer CL
Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):611-41. PubMed ID: 17302005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Are new liability caps working?
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2003 Feb; 12(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 12658849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lessons learned from the "laboratories of democracy": a critique of federal medical liability reform.
Conroy AD
Cornell Law Rev; 2006 Jul; 91(5):1159-202. PubMed ID: 16827219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical malpractice: trends in litigation.
Floyd TK
Gastroenterology; 2008 Jun; 134(7):1822-5, 1825.e1. PubMed ID: 18482584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tort reform in medical malpractice.
Regan J; Hamer G; Wright A; White C
Tenn Med; 2004 Jul; 97(7):322-3. PubMed ID: 15359522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective legal reform and the malpractice insurance crisis.
Anderson RE
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):343-55. PubMed ID: 15742580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A presidential boost for tort reform.
Guglielmo WJ
Med Econ; 2002 Sep; 79(17):65-6. PubMed ID: 12298131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Consumer deductibles: how to distribute more equitably the risks of medical malpractice and compensate victims adequately without statutory damage caps.
Ledbetter L
Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2006; 41(4):1141-61. PubMed ID: 17091568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical malpractice reform and insurer claims defense: unintended effects?
Ambrose JM; Carroll A
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2007 Oct; 32(5):843-65. PubMed ID: 17855719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does someone have to die?
Cantor RE
N J Med; 2002 Dec; 99(12):41-2. PubMed ID: 12510573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Insurance. California, here we come.
Haugh R
Hosp Health Netw; 2002 Oct; 76(10):16, 18, 4. PubMed ID: 12416453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Med malaise. Backers of strict malpractice liability limits ignore real solutions to insurance crisis.
Sloane T
Mod Healthc; 2004 May; 34(21):17. PubMed ID: 15202219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical liability reform moves to forefront of health care debates.
Van Koevering M
Healthplan; 2003; 44(2):8, 10. PubMed ID: 12675002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Constitutionality of malpractice non-economic damage cap.
Weber RD
Mich Med; 2003; 102(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 14520908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Turning from damage caps to information disclosure: an alternative to tort reform.
Zeiler K
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):385-98. PubMed ID: 15742583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
