BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16128970)

  • 1. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR; Burrows RF
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies.
    Sue-A-Quan AK; Hannah ME; Cohen MM; Foster GA; Liston RM
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 10234344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perinatal asphyxia: multivariate analysis of risk factors in hospital births.
    Chandra S; Ramji S; Thirupuram S
    Indian Pediatr; 1997 Mar; 34(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 9282487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with hospital-specific cesarean birth rates.
    Newton ER; Higgins CS
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Jun; 34(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 2738872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
    Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of labor and delivery management between nurse midwives and family physicians.
    Hueston WJ; Rudy M
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Nov; 37(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8228856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.
    Oleske DM; Glandon GL; Giacomelli GJ; Hohmann SF
    Health Serv Res; 1991 Aug; 26(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 1869443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of repeat cesarean delivery after trial of labor: do any exist?
    Learman LA; Evertson LR; Shiboski S
    J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Mar; 182(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 8603247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980.
    Placek PJ; Keppel KG; Taffel SM; Liss TL
    Public Health Rep; 1984; 99(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 6424166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
    Shiono PH; McNellis D; Rhoads GG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Obstetric referral in family practice. Factors Affecting Cesarean Section (FACS) Study Group.
    Hueston WJ
    J Fam Pract; 1994 Apr; 38(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 8163961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnosis of dystocia and management with cesarean section among primiparous women in Ottawa-Carleton.
    Stewart PJ; Dulberg C; Arnill AC; Elmslie T; Hall PF
    CMAJ; 1990 Mar; 142(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 2302643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing cesarean birth rates with data-driven quality improvement activities.
    Main EK
    Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):374-83. PubMed ID: 9917479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of care in birth centers. The National Birth Center Study.
    Rooks JP; Weatherby NL; Ernst EK; Stapleton S; Rosen D; Rosenfield A
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Dec; 321(26):1804-11. PubMed ID: 2687692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of patient, physician and hospital characteristics on the likelihood of vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Quebec.
    Goldman G; Pineault R; Bilodeau H; Blais R
    CMAJ; 1990 Nov; 143(10):1017-24. PubMed ID: 2224667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When push comes to shove: implementing VBAC practice guidelines.
    Coulter CH; Lehrfeld R
    Physician Exec; 1995 Jun; 21(6):30-5. PubMed ID: 10161334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changing rates of cesarean delivery: the Duke experience, 1978-1986.
    Hage ML; Helms MJ; Hammond WE; Hammond CB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jul; 72(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 3380513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.
    Keeler EB; Brodie M
    Milbank Q; 1993; 71(3):365-404. PubMed ID: 8413067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.
    Goyert GL; Bottoms SF; Treadwell MC; Nehra PC
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar; 320(11):706-9. PubMed ID: 2922015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.