BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

678 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16128970)

  • 21. Surveillance of cesarean section deliveries, New Jersey, 1999-2004.
    Denk CE; Kruse LK; Jain NJ
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 16948720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Risk factors for cesarean delivery among Puerto Rican women.
    Farr SL; Jamieson DJ; Rivera HV; Ahmed Y; Heilig CM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1351-7. PubMed ID: 17540807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity.
    Kalish RB; McCullough L; Gupta M; Thaler HT; Chervenak FA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1137-41. PubMed ID: 15172844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
    Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Births: final data for 2001.
    Martin JA; Hamilton BE; Ventura SJ; Menacker F; Park MM; Sutton PD
    Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2002 Dec; 51(2):1-102. PubMed ID: 12596439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
    Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Active management of risk in pregnancy at term in an urban population: an association between a higher induction of labor rate and a lower cesarean delivery rate.
    Nicholson JM; Kellar LC; Cronholm PF; Macones GA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1516-28. PubMed ID: 15547519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of obstetric intervention on trends in twin stillbirths: United States, 1989-99.
    Ananth CV; Joseph KS; Kinzler WL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):380-7. PubMed ID: 15280109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cesarean section deliveries in Fiji, 1986 to 1996.
    Saunders DL; Makutu SL
    Pac Health Dialog; 2001 Mar; 8(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 12017841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals.
    Hsu CC; Shieh GR; Wu CS; Shen HC; Tang CH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 16325330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of labor induction on cesarean section rates in diabetic pregnancies.
    Levy AL; Gonzalez JL; Rappaport VJ; Curet LB; Rayburn WF
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Nov; 47(11):931-2. PubMed ID: 12497683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Timing of scheduled cesarean delivery in patients on a teaching versus private service: adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and neonatal outcomes.
    Laye MR; Dellinger EH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):577-82; discussion 582-4. PubMed ID: 16777051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of cesarean section on intermediate and late preterm births: United States, 2000-2003.
    Malloy MH
    Birth; 2009 Mar; 36(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19278380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Continuity of nursing care and its link to cesarean birth rate.
    Gagnon AJ; Meier KM; Waghorn K
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 17324175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Chittiphavorn S; Pinjaroen S; Suwanrath C; Soonthornpun K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Jun; 89(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 16850670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differences between hospitals in cesarean rates for term primigravidas with cephalic presentation.
    Fischer A; LaCoursiere DY; Barnard P; Bloebaum L; Varner M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):816-21. PubMed ID: 15802411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rising cesarean delivery rates: the impact of cesarean delivery on maternal request.
    Coleman VH; Lawrence H; Schulkin J
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2009 Feb; 64(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 19159495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Level of perinatal care of the maternity unit and rate of cesarean in low-risk nulliparas.
    Le Ray C; Carayol M; Zeitlin J; Bréart G; Goffinet F;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 107(6):1269-77. PubMed ID: 16738151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors predicting cesarean delivery for American Indian women in New Mexico.
    Schiff M; Rogers C
    Birth; 1999 Dec; 26(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 10655827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.