BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16129289)

  • 21. Glare sensitivity and optical side effects 1 year after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Neeracher B; Senn P; Schipper I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Aug; 30(8):1696-701. PubMed ID: 15313292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Second operation after laser in situ keratomileusis].
    Liu Y; Zhao HW; Li F
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 46(8):714-8. PubMed ID: 21054996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Long term results of laser refractive operations--methods Epi-LASIK or LASEK].
    Bernátová V; Synek S
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2011 Oct; 67(4):119-28. PubMed ID: 22299520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: in-depth statistical analysis.
    Tuan KM; Liang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Feb; 32(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 16564995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of wavefront aberration changes in the anterior corneal surface after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: preliminary study.
    Buzzonetti L; Iarossi G; Valente P; Volpi M; Petrocelli G; Scullica L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1929-33. PubMed ID: 15342057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 17888086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual performance 3 years after successful macular hole surgery.
    Richter-Mueksch S; Sacu S; Osarovsky-Sasin E; Stifter E; Kiss C; Velikay-Parel M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):660-3. PubMed ID: 19066183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of spectacle-related changes in retinal image size on contrast sensitivity function after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Lackner B; Pieh S; Funovics MA; Schmidinger G; Franz C; Simader C; Skorpik C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):626-32. PubMed ID: 15050259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed].
    Radner W; Willinger U; Obermayer W; Mudrich C; Velikay-Parel M; Eisenwort B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Sep; 213(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 9793916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surface ablation after laser in situ keratomileusis: retreatment on the flap.
    Beerthuizen JJ; Siebelt E
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1376-80. PubMed ID: 17662427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Topography-guided customized laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the treatment of postkeratoplasty astigmatism.
    Rajan MS; O'Brart DP; Patel P; Falcon MG; Marshall J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jun; 32(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 16814052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison between femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis vs laser subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopia.
    de Benito-Llopis L; Teus MA; Gil-Cazorla R; Drake P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 148(6):830-6.e1. PubMed ID: 19781686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Advanced personalized nomogram for myopic laser surgery: first 100 eyes.
    Lapid-Gortzak R; van der Linden JW; van der Meulen IJ; Nieuwendaal CP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1881-5. PubMed ID: 19006733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Factors Affecting Long-term Myopic Regression after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Moderate Myopia.
    Lim SA; Park Y; Cheong YJ; Na KS; Joo CK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 27051256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Recovery of corneal sensitivity in extremely high myopia after laser sub-epithelium keratomileusis].
    Zhou H; Chu RY; Wu Y; Zhou XT; Dai JH; Yao PJ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 43(6):530-4. PubMed ID: 17897531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Learning curve of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: influence on visual and refractive results.
    Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; Sánchez-Pina JM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1381-5. PubMed ID: 17662428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual quality after diffractive intraocular lens implantation in eyes with previous myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Alfonso JF; Madrid-Costa D; Poo-López A; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1848-54. PubMed ID: 19006729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of preoperative tear function on early functional visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Tanaka M; Takano Y; Dogru M; Toda I; Asano-Kato N; Komai-Hori Y; Tsubota K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2311-5. PubMed ID: 15519080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A prospective, contralateral eye study comparing thin-flap LASIK (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) with photorefractive keratectomy.
    Slade SG; Durrie DS; Binder PS
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1075-82. PubMed ID: 19486798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia.
    Schallhorn SC; Tanzer DJ; Kaupp SE; Brown M; Malady SE
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Apr; 116(4):702-9. PubMed ID: 19344822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.