These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax. Bradshaw MF; Hibbard PB; Parton AD; Rose D; Langley K Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2636-44. PubMed ID: 16571356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of age and optical blur on real depth stereoacuity. Costa MF; Moreira SM; Hamer RD; Ventura DF Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Sep; 30(5):660-6. PubMed ID: 20883352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia. Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency. Peterzell DH; Serrano-Pedraza I; Widdall M; Read JCA Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():127-135. PubMed ID: 29155009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception. Fukuda K; Kaneko H; Matsumiya K Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2749-56. PubMed ID: 16600323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asymmetry between horizontal and vertical illusory lines in determining the depth of their embedded surface. Yazdanbakhsh A; Watanabe T Vision Res; 2004; 44(22):2621-7. PubMed ID: 15358077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interaction between binocular rivalry and depth in plaid patterns. Buckthought A; Wilson HR Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(19):2543-56. PubMed ID: 17688905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human vergence eye movements to oblique disparity stimuli: evidence for an anisotropy favoring horizontal disparities. Rambold HA; Miles FA Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(19):2006-19. PubMed ID: 18675438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glass-pattern detection is tuned for stereo-depth. Khuu SK; Hayes A Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2461-9. PubMed ID: 15979467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new look at binocular stereopsis. Pizlo Z; Li Y; Francis G Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation. Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of surface placement and surface overlap on stereo slant contrast and enhancement. Gillam BJ; Pianta MJ Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3083-95. PubMed ID: 16112705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dissociations between slant-contrast and reversed slant-contrast. Poom L; Olsson H; Börjesson E Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 17300825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]