345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16130240)
1. Court decision on medical marijuana use worries patient advocates.
Krisberg K
Nations Health; 2005 Aug; 35(6):1,14. PubMed ID: 16130240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical marijuana, American federalism, and the Supreme Court.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 2005 Aug; 294(7):842-4. PubMed ID: 16106011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical marijuana and the Supreme Court.
Okie S
N Engl J Med; 2005 Aug; 353(7):648-51. PubMed ID: 16107619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Gonzales v. Raich: federalism as a casualty of the war on drugs.
Somin I
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2006; 15(3):507-50. PubMed ID: 17593582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Gonzales v. Raich. In the Supreme Court of the United States.
Bostrom BA
Issues Law Med; 2005; 21(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 16173504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ashcroft v. Raich background.
Laughlin C
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):396-9. PubMed ID: 16083100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Justices reject U.S. bid to block assisted suicide; Court, 6-3, says attorney general was wrong in Oregon case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16432926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The assisted-suicide decision.
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 16429626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Justices say doctors may not be punished for recommending medical marijuana.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A14. PubMed ID: 14610768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Pain Relief Promotion Act: Congress's misguided intervention into end-of-life care.
Buzzee SE
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 2001; 70(1):217-49. PubMed ID: 16389683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. California's Compassionate Use Act and the federal government's medical marijuana policy: can California physicians recommend marijuana to their patients without subjecting themselves to sanctions?
Rojas LM
McGeorge Law Rev; 1999; 30(4):1373-425. PubMed ID: 15709269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Gonzales v Raich: the US supreme court's consideration captured the public policy debate about the medical use of marijuana.
Lorber L
Gend Med; 2005 Sep; 2(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 16290884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Who defines "legitimate medical practice?" Lessons learned from the Controlled Substances Act, physician-assisted suicide, and Oregon v. Ashcroft.
Gast S
Va J Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):261-91. PubMed ID: 16493846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court and the purposes of medicine.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):993-5. PubMed ID: 16525134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Justices explore U.S. authority over states in assisted suicide.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 Oct; ():A1, A32. PubMed ID: 16231463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulation of medical marijuana.
Das R
JAMA; 2005 Dec; 294(24):3091; author reply 3091-2. PubMed ID: 16380588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Congress, controlled substances, and physician-assisted suicide--elephants in mouseholes.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 16525147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Gonzales v. Oregon and the politics of medicine.
Lindsay RA
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2006 Mar; 16(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 16770893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Jumping frogs, endangered toads, and California's medical-marijuana law.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2005 Nov; 353(21):2291-6. PubMed ID: 16306529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clearing the air: what the latest Supreme Court decision regarding medical marijuana really means.
Aggarwal S; Carter GT; Steinborn JJ
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2005; 22(5):327-9. PubMed ID: 16225351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
