These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16130465)

  • 1. Prediction of random effects in finite mixture models with Gaussian components.
    Gianola D
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Jun; 122(3):145-60. PubMed ID: 16130465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction error variance and expected response to selection, when selection is based on the best predictor - for Gaussian and threshold characters, traits following a Poisson mixed model and survival traits.
    Korsgaard IR; Andersen AH; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 12081800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian hierarchically weighted finite mixture models for samples of distributions.
    Rodriguez A; Dunson DB; Taylor J
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):155-71. PubMed ID: 18708650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recursive relationships between milk yield and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins from finite mixture random regression models.
    Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5474-86. PubMed ID: 20965363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian inference for finite mixtures of univariate and multivariate skew-normal and skew-t distributions.
    Frühwirth-Schnatter S; Pyne S
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):317-36. PubMed ID: 20110247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimum Hellinger distance estimation for k-component poisson mixture with random effects.
    Xiang L; Yau KK; Van Hui Y; Lee AH
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):508-18. PubMed ID: 17970817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic analysis of somatic cell scores in US Holsteins with a Bayesian mixture model.
    Boettcher PJ; Caraviello D; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):435-4. PubMed ID: 17183112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From here to infinity: sparse finite versus Dirichlet process mixtures in model-based clustering.
    Frühwirth-Schnatter S; Malsiner-Walli G
    Adv Data Anal Classif; 2019; 13(1):33-64. PubMed ID: 31007770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimates of genetic parameters for stayability to consecutive calvings of Canadian Simmentals by random regression models.
    Jamrozik J; McGrath S; Kemp RA; Miller SP
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3634-43. PubMed ID: 23881688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of model specifications on the reliabilities of genomic prediction in a Swedish-Finnish red breed cattle population.
    Rius-Vilarrasa E; Brøndum RF; Strandén I; Guldbrandtsen B; Strandberg E; Lund MS; Fikse WF
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Oct; 129(5):369-79. PubMed ID: 22963358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.
    Wang T; Chen YP; Goddard ME; Meuwissen TH; Kemper KE; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 25926276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parsimonious mixtures of multivariate contaminated normal distributions.
    Punzo A; McNicholas PD
    Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1506-1537. PubMed ID: 27510372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian bivariate linear mixed-effects models with skew-normal/independent distributions, with application to AIDS clinical studies.
    Huang Y; Chen R; Dagne G; Zhu Y; Chen H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):373-96. PubMed ID: 24897242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Including probe-level measurement error in robust mixture clustering of replicated microarray gene expression.
    Liu X; Rattray M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article42. PubMed ID: 21194414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust, automatic spike sorting using mixtures of multivariate t-distributions.
    Shoham S; Fellows MR; Normann RA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Aug; 127(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 12906941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear prediction for Gaussian mixture image models.
    Zhang J; Ma D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2004 Jun; 13(6):836-47. PubMed ID: 15648873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian Genomic Prediction with Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Models.
    Cuevas J; Crossa J; Montesinos-López OA; Burgueño J; Pérez-Rodríguez P; de Los Campos G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jan; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 27793970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian conjugate analysis using a generalized inverted Wishart distribution accounts for differential uncertainty among the genetic parameters--an application to the maternal animal model.
    Munilla S; Cantet RJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Jun; 129(3):173-87. PubMed ID: 22583322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inference of finite mixture models and the effect of binning.
    Geissen EM; Hasenauer J; Radde NE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2019 Jul; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 31348764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle.
    Neuner S; Emmerling R; Thaller G; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4344-54. PubMed ID: 18946140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.