91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16131244)
1. Evidence for an activation locus of the word-frequency effect in lexical decision.
Allen PA; Smith AF; Lien MC; Grabbe J; Murphy MD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):713-21. PubMed ID: 16131244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling lexical decision: the form of frequency and diversity effects.
Adelman JS; Brown GD
Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):214-29. PubMed ID: 18211194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sequential effects in the lexical decision task: the role of the item frequency of the previous trial.
Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):385-401. PubMed ID: 12745840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Word frequency effects at brief exposure durations: comment on Paap and Johansen (1994).
Allen PA; Smith AF; Lien MC; Weber TA; Madden DJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1792-7. PubMed ID: 9425681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.
Wagenmakers EJ; Steyvers M; Raaijmakers JG; Shiffrin RM; van Rijn H; Zeelenberg R
Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):332-67. PubMed ID: 15020215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The rank hypothesis and lexical decision: a reply to Adelman and Brown (2008).
Murray WS; Forster KI
Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):240-52. PubMed ID: 18211198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization.
De Deyne S; Storms G
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 16777041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Model-generated lexical activity predicts graded ERP amplitudes in lexical decision.
Braun M; Jacobs AM; Hahne A; Ricker B; Hofmann M; Hutzler F
Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1073-1074():431-9. PubMed ID: 16464440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The development of the orthographic consistency effect in speech recognition: from sublexical to lexical involvement.
Ventura P; Morais J; Kolinsky R
Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):547-76. PubMed ID: 17250820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of acute exposure to a complex fragrance on lexical decision performance.
Gaygen DE; Hedge A
Chem Senses; 2009 Jan; 34(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 18829946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What determines the speed of lexical access: homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al. (2003).
Caramazza A; Bi Y; Costa A; Miozzo M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):278-82. PubMed ID: 14736312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.
White SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18248149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: evidence from eye movements.
Dahan D; Magnuson JS; Tanenhaus MK
Cogn Psychol; 2001 Jun; 42(4):317-67. PubMed ID: 11368527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006).
Estes Z; Adelman JS
Emotion; 2008 Aug; 8(4):441-4; discussion 445-57. PubMed ID: 18729575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lexical restructuring in the absence of literacy.
Venturaa P; Kolinsky R; Fernandesa S; Queridoa L; Morais J
Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):334-61. PubMed ID: 17113063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision.
Sears CR; Campbell CR; Lupker SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1040-62. PubMed ID: 16846296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
Yap MJ; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence.
Kuchinke L; Võ ML; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17532075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]