These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16131244)

  • 21. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
    O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary?
    Borowsky R; Besner D
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):181-95; discussion 196-200. PubMed ID: 16478310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
    Alija M; Cuetos F
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the role of set when reading aloud: a dissociation between prelexical and lexical processing.
    Paulitzki JR; Risko EF; O'Malley S; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 19144540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
    Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of low-spatial frequencies in lexical decision and masked priming.
    Boden C; Giaschi D
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Apr; 69(3):580-91. PubMed ID: 19168272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The representation of homophones: evidence from the distractor-frequency effect.
    Miozzo M; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1360-71. PubMed ID: 16393051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Syllables and bigrams: orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels.
    Conrad M; Carreiras M; Tamm S; Jacobs AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):461-79. PubMed ID: 19331501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.
    Rabovsky M; Alvarez CJ; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():156-65. PubMed ID: 18585684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The many places of frequency: evidence for a novel locus of the lexical frequency effect in word production.
    Knobel M; Finkbeiner M; Caramazza A
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Mar; 25(2):256-86. PubMed ID: 18568814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The neural bases of the lexical effect: an fMRI investigation.
    Myers EB; Blumstein SE
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):278-88. PubMed ID: 17504782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task.
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):301-14. PubMed ID: 15971693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differential activation of frontal and parietal regions during visual word recognition: an optical topography study.
    Hofmann MJ; Herrmann MJ; Dan I; Obrig H; Conrad M; Kuchinke L; Jacobs AM; Fallgatter AJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 Apr; 40(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 18262438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does the frequency of the antecedent noun affect the resolution of pronominal anaphors? An ERP study.
    Heine A; Tamm S; Hofmann M; Hutzler F; Jacobs AM
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 May; 400(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 16503377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of word length on lexical decision in dyslexic and normal reading children.
    Martens VE; de Jong PF
    Brain Lang; 2006 Aug; 98(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 16690111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lexical inhibition and sublexical facilitation are surprisingly long lasting.
    Sumner M; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):769-90. PubMed ID: 17576153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological-lexical competition.
    Prabhakaran R; Blumstein SE; Myers EB; Hutchison E; Britton B
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2209-21. PubMed ID: 16842827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: evidence for nonselective lexical access.
    Duyck W; Assche EV; Drieghe D; Hartsuiker RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):663-79. PubMed ID: 17576146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attentional shifting and the role of the dorsal pathway in visual word recognition.
    Pammer K; Hansen P; Holliday I; Cornelissen P
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(14):2926-36. PubMed ID: 16950456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Word length and lexical activation: longer is better.
    Pitt MA; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1120-35. PubMed ID: 17002526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.