336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16131266)
1. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
Jang Y; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning.
Sikström S; Jönsson F
Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):932-50. PubMed ID: 16262474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
Tiede HL; Leboe JP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
Rhodes MG; Castel AD
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.
Dunlosky J; Matvey G
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1180-91. PubMed ID: 11550746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using a multidimensional scaling approach to investigate the underlying basis of ease of learning judgments.
Jönsson FU; Lindström BR
Scand J Psychol; 2010 Apr; 51(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 19958466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does ADHD in adults affect the relative accuracy of metamemory judgments?
Knouse LE; Paradise MJ; Dunlosky J
J Atten Disord; 2006 Nov; 10(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 17085626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of the difficulty of prior items on the magnitude of judgments of learning for subsequent items.
Richards RM; Nelson TO
Am J Psychol; 2004; 117(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 15058858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
Illman NA; Morrison CM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple bases for young and older adults' judgments of learning in multitrial learning.
Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):474-83. PubMed ID: 21942899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect.
Finn B; Metcalfe J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):238-44. PubMed ID: 17201565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: the utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning.
Castel AD
Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 18426071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition.
Zaromb FM; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):552-7. PubMed ID: 20192550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
