336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16131266)
21. Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study.
Koriat A; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15755238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).
Nelson TO; Narens L; Dunlosky J
Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 15053719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Do older adults show less confidence in their monitoring of learning?
Serra MJ; Dunlosky J; Hertzog C
Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 18726751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall.
Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.
Metcalfe J; Finn B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Judgments of learning as memory modifiers.
Soderstrom NC; Clark CT; Halamish V; Bjork EL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):553-8. PubMed ID: 25528101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention.
Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU
Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Metacognition and mindreading: judgments of learning for Self and Other during self-paced study.
Koriat A; Ackerman R
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):251-64. PubMed ID: 20096606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Collaboration in associative recognition memory: using recalled information to defend "new" judgments.
Clark SE; Abbe A; Larson RP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1266-73. PubMed ID: 17087582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance: Positive, negative, or both?
Janes JL; Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 29611141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The testing effect as a function of explicit testing instructions and judgments of learning.
Jönsson FU; Hedner M; Olsson MJ
Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):251-7. PubMed ID: 22580409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.
Mazzoni G; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1263-74. PubMed ID: 8744965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
Topolinski S; Strack F
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Divided attention at encoding: effect on feeling-of-knowing.
Sacher M; Taconnat L; Souchay C; Isingrini M
Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):754-61. PubMed ID: 19423362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring.
Scheck P; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 15702968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
