These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16131897)

  • 61. Is an impacted morselized graft in a cage an alternative for reconstructing segmental diaphyseal defects?
    Bullens PH; Bart Schreuder HW; de Waal Malefijt MC; Verdonschot N; Buma P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 467(3):783-91. PubMed ID: 19142693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup: minimum 10-year follow-up.
    Lee JM; Nam HT
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Oct; 26(7):1057-60. PubMed ID: 21592720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effects of Titanium Mesh Surfaces-Coated with Hydroxyapatite/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Nanotubes on Acetabular Bone Defects in Rabbits.
    Nguyen TT; Bae TS; Yang DH; Park MS; Yoon SJ
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Jul; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 28686210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The use of morselized allografts without impaction and cemented cage support in acetabular revision surgery: a 4- to 9-year follow-up.
    Ding H; Mao Y; Yu B; Zhu Z; Li H; Yu B; Huang J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 May; 10():77. PubMed ID: 25998544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Acetabular bone grafting in primary total hip arthroplasty].
    Dutka J; Sosin P; Urban M; Libura M
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2002; 67(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 12148186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A 1-year study of hydroxyapatite-derived biomaterials in an adult sheep model: III. Comparison with autogenous bone graft for facial augmentation.
    Gosain AK; Riordan PA; Song L; Amarante MT; Kalantarian B; Nagy PG; Wilson CR; Toth JM; McIntyre BL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 116(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 16163093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Multidetector-CT evaluation of bone substitutes remodeling after revision hip surgery.
    Nishii T; Sugano N; Miki H; Koyama T; Yoshikawa H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jan; 442():158-64. PubMed ID: 16394755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Acetabular revision with impacted irradiated frozen allografts].
    Wang Q; Zhang XL; Jiang Y; Chen YS; Shen H; Shao JJ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 48(14):1045-9. PubMed ID: 21055105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Treatment of acetabular defects during revision total hip arthroplasty--preliminary clinical and radiological outcome using bone substitute materials.
    Haenle M; Schlüter S; Ellenrieder M; Mittelmeier W; Bader R
    Hip Int; 2013; 23(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 23397205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Bone graft substitutes in hip revision surgery: a comprehensive overview.
    Beswick A; Blom AW
    Injury; 2011 Sep; 42 Suppl 2():S40-6. PubMed ID: 21752368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
    Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Impacted bone and calcium phosphate cement for repair of femoral head defects: a pilot study.
    Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW; Buma P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 459():216-21. PubMed ID: 17308484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A 2- to 16-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Acetabular Implant Combined With Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Cup.
    Stigbrand H; Gustafsson O; Ullmark G
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Mar; 33(3):815-822. PubMed ID: 29153632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement.
    Slooff TJ; Buma P; Schreurs BW; Schimmel JW; Huiskes R; Gardeniers J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Mar; (324):108-15. PubMed ID: 8595745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A long-term study on defect filling and bone ingrowth using a canine fiber metal total hip model.
    Greis PE; Kang JD; Silvaggio V; Rubash HE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):47-59. PubMed ID: 1729022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. High proximal migration in cemented acetabular revisions operated with bone impaction grafting; 47 revision cups followed with RSA for 17 years.
    Mohaddes M; Herberts P; Malchau H; Johanson PE; Kärrholm J
    Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):251-258. PubMed ID: 27886360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Acetabular impaction grafting in total hip replacement.
    Rigby M; Kenny PJ; Sharp R; Whitehouse SL; Gie GA; Timperley JA
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 21818739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Injectable biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramic: The HYDROS concept.
    Baroth S; Bourges X; Goyenvalle E; Aguado E; Daculsi G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2009; 19(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 19458448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Mechanical and chemical bonding of artificial joints.
    Oonishi H
    Clin Mater; 1990; 5(2-4):217-33. PubMed ID: 10147505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Bone grafts, bone graft extenders, substitutes and enhancers for acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Pierannunzii L; Zagra L
    EFORT Open Rev; 2016 Dec; 1(12):431-439. PubMed ID: 28461922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.