BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16132026)

  • 1. [Evaluation and routine testing in medical imaging departments -- Part2-8: Constancy tests-protective shielding, -barriers and -devices JIS Z4752-2-8 (IEC 61223-2-8)].
    Itou T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Aug; 61(8):1104-5. PubMed ID: 16132026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation Protection Clothing in X-Ray Diagnostics - Influence of the Different Methods of Measurement on the Lead Equivalent and the Required Mass.
    Schöpf T; Pichler T
    Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):768-75. PubMed ID: 27248650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Examination of optimal radiation quality in the lead equivalent examination of X-ray protective clothing].
    Inoue S; Matsumoto M; Matsuzawa R
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1682-7. PubMed ID: 15614219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Best practices for evaluating and tracking protective garments.
    Clements J; Moirano J; Sherry C; Barr P; Berg J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 May; 12(5):531-2. PubMed ID: 25817382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Radiation protection clothing in X-ray diagnostics - comparison of attenuation equivalents in narrow beam and inverse broad-beam geometry].
    Pichler T; Schöpf T; Ennemoser O
    Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 21246474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can Aprons Be Properly Evaluated for Their Protective Quality without In-House Validation?
    Weissenborn M; Heithaus E; Weir V; Onofrio A; Rees C
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1933-1935.e2. PubMed ID: 27886959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Did you know this about your lead apron?
    Tan J; Brock-Utne JG
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Aug; 117(2):534-5. PubMed ID: 23881379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sun-protective clothes: accuracy of laboratory testing.
    Gambichler T; Bader A; Avermaete A; Altmeyer P; Hoffmann K
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2001 Jul; 15(4):371-2. PubMed ID: 11730064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protective aprons in imaging departments: manufacturer stated lead equivalence values require validation.
    Finnerty M; Brennan PC
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1477-84. PubMed ID: 15789212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite?
    Lu H; Boyd C; Dawson J
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 May; 57(5):730-739. PubMed ID: 31005510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation safety program--for diagnostic radiology departments.
    Radiol Technol; 1980; 52(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 7280215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Armadillo: a protective clothing as a shield from x-radiation.
    TANNER JM; WHITEHOUSE RH; POWELL JH
    Lancet; 1958 Oct; 2(7050):779-80. PubMed ID: 13589001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defects in new protective aprons.
    Glaze S; LeBlanc AD; Bushong SC
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):217-8. PubMed ID: 6729117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A quantitative assessment of ultraviolet radiation transmission through compression socks.
    Valentine R; Moseley H
    Br J Dermatol; 2015; 172(5):1445-7. PubMed ID: 25399922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emission of fluorescent x-radiation from non-lead based shielding materials of protective clothing: a radiobiological problem?
    Schmid E; Panzer W; Schlattl H; Eder H
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):N129-39. PubMed ID: 22809876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Important changes in medical x-ray imaging facility shielding design methodology. A brief summary of recommendations in NCRP Report No. 147.
    Archer BR; Gray JE
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3599-601. PubMed ID: 16475758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. X-Ray protective clothing: does DIN 6857-1 allow an objective comparison between lead-free and lead-composite materials?
    Eder H; Schlattl H; Hoeschen C
    Rofo; 2010 May; 182(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 20143286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The methodology of choosing the materials for the means for individual protection from ionizing radiation].
    Benetskiĭ BA; Gogin EE; Filatov VN
    Gig Sanit; 1993 Jan; (1):51-3. PubMed ID: 8339972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation and chemical degradation of UVR protection characteristics of fabrics.
    Khazova M; O'Hagan JB; Grainger KJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 17065196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.