131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16132035)
21. Computed radiography: its impact on radiographers.
Cesar LJ
Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 9008016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reduction of a grid moiré pattern by integrating a carbon-interspaced high precision x-ray grid with a digital radiographic detector.
Yoon JW; Park YG; Park CJ; Kim DI; Lee JH; Chung NK; Choe BY; Suh TS; Lee HK
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4092-7. PubMed ID: 18072475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A software data generator for radiographic imaging investigations.
Lazos D; Kolitsi Z; Pallikarakis N
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2000 Mar; 4(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 10761778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
Van Ongeval Ch
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Application of AMBER in single- and dual-energy digital imaging: improvement in noise level and display dynamic range.
de Rooij TP; Oestmann JW; Schultze Kool LJ; Vrooman HA; Prokop M; Schaefer CM
Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):407-14. PubMed ID: 8190963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pediatric musculoskeletal computed radiography.
Kottamasu SR; Kuhns LR; Stringer DA
Pediatr Radiol; 1997 Jul; 27(7):563-75. PubMed ID: 9211947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography.
Pisano ED; Zuley M; Baum JK; Marques HS
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):813-30, vi. PubMed ID: 17888771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic advantages and possibilities for secondary reconstruction of NewTom 9000 data sets using eFilm.
Schulze D; Heiland M
Int J Comput Dent; 2004 Jan; 7(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 15317308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. GridIMAGE: a novel use of grid computing to support interactive human and computer-assisted detection decision support.
Gurcan MN; Pan T; Sharma A; Kurc T; Oster S; Langella S; Hastings S; Siddiqui KM; Siegel EL; Saltz J
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):160-71. PubMed ID: 17318701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Image preprocessing for a picture archiving and communication system.
McNitt-Gray MF; Pietka E; Huang HK
Invest Radiol; 1992 Jul; 27(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 1644553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A study of grid artifacts formation and elimination in computed radiographic images.
Lin CY; Lee WJ; Chen SJ; Tsai CH; Lee JH; Chang CH; Ching YT
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Dec; 19(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 16763931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of scatter reduction on the signal-to-noise ratio in computed radiography.
Miettunen RH; Korhola OA
Eur J Radiol; 1991; 12(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 1855509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A GPU Simulation Tool for Training and Optimisation in 2D Digital X-Ray Imaging.
Gallio E; Rampado O; Gianaria E; Bianchi SD; Ropolo R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141497. PubMed ID: 26545097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimal combination of anti-scatter grids and software correction for CBCT imaging.
Stankovic U; Ploeger LS; van Herk M; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4437-4451. PubMed ID: 28556204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Combining scatter reduction and correction to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Jin JY; Ren L; Liu Q; Kim J; Wen N; Guan H; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5634-44. PubMed ID: 21158275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Potential Role of Grid-Like Software in Bedside Chest Radiography in Improving Image Quality and Dose Reduction: An Observer Preference Study.
Ahn SY; Chae KJ; Goo JM
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(3):526-533. PubMed ID: 29713231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital chest radiography at the University of Chicago: present status and future plans.
MacMahon H
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):11-4. PubMed ID: 7734531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit.
Gagne RM; Boswell JS; Myers KJ
Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2180-93. PubMed ID: 12945984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Digital fluoroscopic radiology: evaluation of the clinical impact.
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Georgi M
Eur J Radiol; 1993 Jun; 17(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 8348910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
