301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16133397)
1. Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Nakai T; Okuyama C; Kubota T; Yamada K; Ushijima Y; Taniike K; Suzuki T; Nishimura T
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Nov; 32(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 16133397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is (99m)Tc-MDP whole body bone scintigraphy adjuvant to (18)F-FDG-PET for the detection of skeletal metastases?
Sahin E; Zincirkeser S; Akcan AB; Elboga U
J BUON; 2014; 19(1):291-6. PubMed ID: 24659678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by 18FDG PET: differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions.
Cook GJ; Houston S; Rubens R; Maisey MN; Fogelman I
J Clin Oncol; 1998 Oct; 16(10):3375-9. PubMed ID: 9779715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Osteoblastic bone metastases in breast cancer: is not seeing believing?
Fogelman I
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Nov; 32(11):1250-2. PubMed ID: 16133386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Progressive osteoblastic bone metastases in breast cancer negative on FDG-PET.
Huyge V; Garcia C; Vanderstappen A; Alexiou J; Gil T; Flamen P
Clin Nucl Med; 2009 Jul; 34(7):417-20. PubMed ID: 19542943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 18FDG-PET with 99mTc-HMDP scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Abe K; Sasaki M; Kuwabara Y; Koga H; Baba S; Hayashi K; Takahashi N; Honda H
Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Oct; 19(7):573-9. PubMed ID: 16363622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fasting Enhances the Contrast of Bone Metastatic Lesions in
Oka S; Kanagawa M; Doi Y; Schuster DM; Goodman MM; Yoshimura H
Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Apr; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 28468238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone metastases from breast cancer: associations between morphologic CT patterns and glycolytic activity on PET and bone scintigraphy as well as explorative search for influential factors.
Sugihara T; Koizumi M; Koyama M; Terauchi T; Gomi N; Ito Y; Hatake K; Sata N
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Dec; 31(10):719-725. PubMed ID: 28864931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic values of 99mTc-MDP-planar bone scintigraphy, 131I-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer.
Qiu ZL; Xue YL; Song HJ; Luo QY
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1232-42. PubMed ID: 23111353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and bone scintigraphy in detection of bone metastases of thyroid cancer.
Ito S; Kato K; Ikeda M; Iwano S; Makino N; Tadokoro M; Abe S; Nakano S; Nishino M; Ishigaki T; Naganawa S
J Nucl Med; 2007 Jun; 48(6):889-95. PubMed ID: 17504877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and (99m)Tc-MDP whole-body bone scanning for imaging osteolytic bone metastases.
Zhang L; Chen L; Xie Q; Zhang Y; Cheng L; Li H; Wang J
BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Mar; 15():7. PubMed ID: 25885599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing whole body (18)F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Yang SN; Liang JA; Lin FJ; Kao CH; Lin CC; Lee CC
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2002 Jun; 128(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 12073051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metabolic activity in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer were similar as studied by
Pietrzak A; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(3):237-240. PubMed ID: 29177262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: Do we still need the bone scan?
Caglar M; Kupik O; Karabulut E; Høilund-Carlsen PF
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2016; 35(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26514321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole body PET for the evaluation of bony metastases in patients with breast cancer: comparison with 99Tcm-MDP bone scintigraphy.
Ohta M; Tokuda Y; Suzuki Y; Kubota M; Makuuchi H; Tajima T; Nasu S; Suzuki Y; Yasuda S; Shohtsu A
Nucl Med Commun; 2001 Aug; 22(8):875-9. PubMed ID: 11473206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between whole-body positron emission tomography and bone scintigraphy in evaluating bony metastases of esophageal carcinomas.
Kato H; Miyazaki T; Nakajima M; Takita J; Kimura H; Faried A; Sohda M; Fukai Y; Masuda N; Fukuchi M; Manda R; Ojima H; Tsukada K; Kuwano H; Oriuchi N; Endo K
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(6C):4439-44. PubMed ID: 16334123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of hormone receptor status in comparison of 18F -FDG-PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for evaluating bone metastases in patients with breast cancer: single center experience.
Teke F; Teke M; Inal A; Kaplan MA; Kucukoner M; Aksu R; Urakci Z; Tasdemir B; Isikdogan A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(1):387-91. PubMed ID: 25640386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of 18F-FDG-PET/CT vs Bone Scintigraphy in Treatment Response Assessment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer.
Al-Muqbel KM; Yaghan RJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(21):e3753. PubMed ID: 27227942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discordant findings in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: absolutely normal bone scans versus disseminated bone metastases on positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.
Ak I; Sivrikoz MC; Entok E; Vardareli E
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Apr; 37(4):792-6. PubMed ID: 20015657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer.
Hahn S; Heusner T; Kümmel S; Köninger A; Nagarajah J; Müller S; Boy C; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Stahl A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1009-14. PubMed ID: 21969709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
