BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16134070)

  • 1. Creatinine concentration in plasma from dog, rat, and mouse: a comparison of 3 different methods.
    Palm M; Lundblad A
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2005 Sep; 34(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 16134070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of ketoacids on plasma creatinine assays in diabetic ketoacidosis.
    Kemperman FA; Weber JA; Gorgels J; van Zanten AP; Krediet RT; Arisz L
    J Intern Med; 2000 Dec; 248(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 11155144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for serum creatinine and comparison with enzymatic and Jaffe methods.
    Owen LJ; Wear JE; Keevil BG
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2006 Mar; 43(Pt 2):118-23. PubMed ID: 16536913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results of the recalibration of creatinine measurement with the modular Beckman Coulter Jaffe creatinine method.
    Fillée C; Vranken G; Othmane M; Philippe M; Allaeys JM; Courbe A; Ruelle JL; Peeters R
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 49(12):1987-99. PubMed ID: 21801031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of endogenous creatinine clearance as a measure of renal function in mice.
    Dunn SR; Qi Z; Bottinger EP; Breyer MD; Sharma K
    Kidney Int; 2004 May; 65(5):1959-67. PubMed ID: 15086941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Plasma creatinine determination in mice and rats: an enzymatic method compares favorably with a high-performance liquid chromatography assay.
    Keppler A; Gretz N; Schmidt R; Kloetzer HM; Groene HJ; Lelongt B; Meyer M; Sadick M; Pill J
    Kidney Int; 2007 Jan; 71(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 17082757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Candidate reference method for determining serum creatinine by isocratic HPLC: validation with isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and application for accuracy assessment of routine test kits.
    Thienpont LM; Van Landuyt KG; Stöckl D; De Leenheer AP
    Clin Chem; 1995 Jul; 41(7):995-1003. PubMed ID: 7600702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between the enzymatic vitros assay for creatinine determination and three other methods adapted on the Olympus analyzer.
    Badiou S; Dupuy AM; Descomps B; Cristolead JP
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2003; 17(6):235-40. PubMed ID: 14614747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prime time for enzymatic creatinine methods in pediatrics.
    Cobbaert CM; Baadenhuijsen H; Weykamp CW
    Clin Chem; 2009 Mar; 55(3):549-58. PubMed ID: 19168555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Validation of plasma creatinine measurement on UniCel DxC 600 according to LAB GTA 04 recommendation].
    Chianea D; Renard C; Garcia C; Mbongo E; Monpeurt C; Vest P
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010; 68(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 20478771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the ID-MS traceable MDRD equation work and is it suitable for use with compensated Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine assays?
    Vickery S; Stevens PE; Dalton RN; van Lente F; Lamb EJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Sep; 21(9):2439-45. PubMed ID: 16720592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exogenous interferences with Jaffe creatinine assays: addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate to reagent eliminates bilirubin and total protein interference with Jaffe methods.
    Srisawasdi P; Chaichanajarernkul U; Teerakanjana N; Vanavanan S; Kroll MH
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2010; 24(3):123-33. PubMed ID: 20486190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of creatinine in serum and urine by cation-exchange high-pressure liquid chromatography.
    Harmoinen A; Sillanaukee P; Jokela H
    Clin Chem; 1991 Apr; 37(4):563-5. PubMed ID: 2015673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and Analytical Impact of Moving from Jaffe to Enzymatic Serum Creatinine Methodology.
    Syme NR; Stevens K; Stirling C; McMillan DC; Talwar D
    J Appl Lab Med; 2020 Jul; 5(4):631-642. PubMed ID: 32447368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation and comparison of Abbott Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine methods: Could the old method meet the new requirements?
    Küme T; Sağlam B; Ergon C; Sisman AR
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2018 Jan; 32(1):. PubMed ID: 28205269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Specificity characteristics of 7 commercial creatinine measurement procedures by enzymatic and Jaffe method principles.
    Greenberg N; Roberts WL; Bachmann LM; Wright EC; Dalton RN; Zakowski JJ; Miller WG
    Clin Chem; 2012 Feb; 58(2):391-401. PubMed ID: 22166253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reference values for serum creatinine with Jaffe-compensated assay in adult Iranian subjects: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.
    Ghasemi A; Azimzadeh I; Zahediasl S; Azizi F
    Arch Iran Med; 2014 Jun; 17(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 24916523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of serum creatinine by Jaffe method and how to calibrate to eliminate matrix interference problems.
    Chromý V; Rozkosná K; Sedlák P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(8):1127-33. PubMed ID: 18724810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Picric acid methods greatly overestimate serum creatinine in mice: more accurate results with high-performance liquid chromatography.
    Meyer MH; Meyer RA; Gray RW; Irwin RL
    Anal Biochem; 1985 Jan; 144(1):285-90. PubMed ID: 3985323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Enzymatic assay of creatinine in serum: comparison with Jaffé methods (author's transl)].
    Szász G; Börner U; Busch EW; Bablok W
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1979 Nov; 17(11):683-7. PubMed ID: 547029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.