349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16134167)
1. Modified exact sample size for a binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameter estimation.
Fosgate GT
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2857-66. PubMed ID: 16134167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
Cheng Y; Shen Y
Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cluster-adjusted sample size algorithm for proportions was developed using a beta-binomial model.
Fosgate GT
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 17292018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidence intervals for a ratio of binomial proportions based on paired data.
Bonett DG; Price RM
Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):3039-47. PubMed ID: 16345058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies.
Carley S; Dosman S; Jones SR; Harrison M
Emerg Med J; 2005 Mar; 22(3):180-1. PubMed ID: 15735264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing equivalence or non-inferiority in screening tests with paired and independent binomial endpoints through confidence intervals for the odds ratio.
Zaslavsky BG
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2837-55. PubMed ID: 16134143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sample size determination for matched-pair equivalence trials using rate ratio.
Tang NS; Tang ML; Wang SF
Biostatistics; 2007 Jul; 8(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 17071862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Point and interval estimation of accuracies of a binary medical diagnostic test following group sequential testing.
Shu Y; Liu A; Li Z
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Jul; 366(1874):2335-45. PubMed ID: 18407894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Joint estimation of diagnostic accuracy measures for paired organs--application in ophthalmology.
de Leon AR; Soo A; Bonzo DC; Rudnisky CJ
Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):837-50. PubMed ID: 19697307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sample size determination in reference-controlled diagnostic trials].
Krummenauer F; Kauczor HU
Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1438-44. PubMed ID: 12424672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidence intervals for a ratio of two independent binomial proportions.
Price RM; Bonett DG
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5497-508. PubMed ID: 18781560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies.
Flahault A; Cadilhac M; Thomas G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):859-62. PubMed ID: 16018921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A general approach to sample size determination for prevalence surveys that use dual test protocols.
Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):694-706. PubMed ID: 17722203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confidence intervals for the binomial parameter: some new considerations.
Reiczigel J
Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):611-21. PubMed ID: 12590417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test.
Dendukuri N; Rahme E; Bélisle P; Joseph L
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 15180664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sequential equivalence testing and repeated confidence intervals, with applications to normal and binary responses.
Jennison C; Turnbull BW
Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 8513110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision.
Bonett DG
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1331-5. PubMed ID: 12111881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small-sample confidence sets for the MTD in a phase I clinical trial.
Storer BE
Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1117-25. PubMed ID: 8117905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
