These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16134272)

  • 1. Senators mull new ways to make stem cells.
    Regalado A
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 Jul; ():B1,B4. PubMed ID: 16134272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Washington insider. The elections and Congress: a continued statement on embryo research?
    Doerflinger RM
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 15887337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Altered embryos offered as solution to stem-cell rift.
    Check E
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7049):309. PubMed ID: 16034380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Causative vs. beneficial complicity in the embryonic stem cell debate.
    Robertson JA
    Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1099-113. PubMed ID: 15868676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Leftover embryos: 'this is not junk science'.
    Kavanaugh JF
    America (NY); 2005 Jun 20-27; 192(21):8. PubMed ID: 16175698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stem cells, embryos, and casualties of war.
    Bonchek LI
    Free Inq; 2002; 22(3):58. PubMed ID: 12731508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stem-cell lines.
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 May; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15966127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination.
    Fujikawa R
    South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The battle over stem cells.
    Randerson J
    New Sci; 2004 Oct 9-15; 184(2468):23. PubMed ID: 15543680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lies in embryo.
    Caplan A
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):15-6. PubMed ID: 16830437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Senators grill NIH director over restrictions on stem-cell research.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2003 Jun; 49(39):A25. PubMed ID: 15287128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In cloning debate, a compromise.
    Lamb GM
    Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2004 Apr; ():14, 16. PubMed ID: 15457614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Washington insider: federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
    Doerflinger RM
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 16425497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stem cells, politics and the progress paradigm.
    DeBow S; Bubela T; Caulfield T
    Health Law Rev; 2006; 15(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 17153769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stem cells. Restiveness grows at NIH over Bush research restrictions.
    Holden C
    Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5720):334-5. PubMed ID: 15831721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. It's legal: Italian researchers defend their work with embryonic stem cells.
    Pasotti J; Stafford N
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7100):229. PubMed ID: 16855553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stem cells: still here, still waiting.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2003 May; 300(5621):865. PubMed ID: 12738815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The embryonic stem cell research debate.
    Coleman G
    Origins; 2004 Nov; 34(23):361, 363-6. PubMed ID: 15688548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stem cells derived from 'dead' human embryo.
    Pearson H; Abbott A
    Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7110):376-7. PubMed ID: 17006477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The lure of stem-cell lines.
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):336-7. PubMed ID: 16871175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.