These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1613450)

  • 1. Developmental changes in memorial comparisons: the effects of stimulus presentation mode.
    Wright KP; Berch DB
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1992 Jun; 53(3):219-36. PubMed ID: 1613450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Activating representations in permanent memory: different benefits for pictures and words.
    Seifert LS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1106-21. PubMed ID: 9293624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revisiting the picture-superiority effect in symbolic comparisons: do pictures provide privileged access?
    Amrhein PC; McDaniel MA; Waddill P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):843-57. PubMed ID: 12219794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.
    Shaki S; Algom D
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 11958352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of spacing repetitions on the recognition memory of young children and adults.
    Toppino TC; Kasserman JE; Mracek WA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1991 Feb; 51(1):123-38. PubMed ID: 2010724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of size congruency on item and size recognition with words or pictures.
    Standing LG; Bertrand MI
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):449-56. PubMed ID: 19093606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extensions of the picture superiority effect in associative recognition.
    Hockley WE; Bancroft T
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Dec; 65(4):236-44. PubMed ID: 21728402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The selective impact of question form and input mode on the symbolic distance effect in children.
    McGonigle B; Chalmers M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1984 Jun; 37(3):525-54. PubMed ID: 6747547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of multimodal stimulus presentation on recall.
    Kobus DA; Moses JD; Bloom FA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Feb; 78(1):320-2. PubMed ID: 8177681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information.
    Palmer J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 May; 16(2):332-50. PubMed ID: 2142203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The picture superiority effect in associative recognition.
    Hockley WE
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1351-9. PubMed ID: 18927048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The gating paradigm: effects of presentation format on spoken word recognition by children and adults.
    Walley AC; Michela VL; Wood DR
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Apr; 57(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 7770325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is phonological encoding in naming influenced by literacy?
    Ventura P; Kolinsky R; Querido JL; Fernandes S; Morais J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2007 Sep; 36(5):341-60. PubMed ID: 17318434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What makes a vibble a vibble? A developmental study of category generalization.
    Ward TB; Vela E; Peery ML; Lewis SN; Bauer NK; Klint KA
    Child Dev; 1989 Feb; 60(1):214-24. PubMed ID: 2702869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A feature-sampling account of the time course of old-new recognition judgments.
    Brockdorff N; Lamberts K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):77-102. PubMed ID: 10682291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judgments of duration, figure-ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords.
    Reber R; Zimmermann TD; Wurtz P
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1105-14. PubMed ID: 15751469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of pictorial depth information on projected size judgments.
    Farran EK; Whitaker A; Patel N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 19304611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Absolute and relative perceptual codes in young children.
    Duffy J; Zivian MT; Deboran AM
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jul; 48(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 2377438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative distance judgments of familiar and unfamiliar objects viewed under representatively natural conditions.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Apr; 47(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 2345687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The discriminability of remembered magnitudes.
    Baranski JV; Petrusic WM
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):254-70. PubMed ID: 1508051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.