These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16135040)

  • 21. Global tests for multiple binary outcomes.
    Lefkopoulou M; Ryan L
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):975-88. PubMed ID: 8117908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cluster sampling techniques in quantal response teratology and developmental toxicity studies.
    Bieler GS; Williams RL
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):764-76. PubMed ID: 7662858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MSurvPow: a FORTRAN program to calculate the sample size and power for cluster-randomized clinical trials with survival outcomes.
    Gao F; Manatunga AK; Chen S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Apr; 78(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 15780890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Data cloning: easy maximum likelihood estimation for complex ecological models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.
    Lele SR; Dennis B; Lutscher F
    Ecol Lett; 2007 Jul; 10(7):551-63. PubMed ID: 17542934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Model uncertainty and risk estimation for experimental studies of quantal responses.
    Bailer AJ; Noble RB; Wheeler MW
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 15876205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of omitted confounders on the analysis of correlated binary data.
    Chao WH; Palta M; Young T
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):678-89. PubMed ID: 9192456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bayesian approach to average power calculations for binary regression models with misclassified outcomes.
    Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):848-63. PubMed ID: 19061210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of capture-recapture models with individual covariates using data augmentation.
    Royle JA
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):267-74. PubMed ID: 18422793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Constructing intervals for the intracluster correlation coefficient using Bayesian modelling, and application in cluster randomized trials.
    Turner RM; Omar RZ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1443-56. PubMed ID: 16220510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Structured additive regression for categorical space-time data: a mixed model approach.
    Kneib T; Fahrmeir L
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 16542236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marginalized models for moderate to long series of longitudinal binary response data.
    Schildcrout JS; Heagerty PJ
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 17688485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling survival data with informative cluster size.
    Williamson JM; Kim HY; Manatunga A; Addiss DG
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):543-55. PubMed ID: 17640035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayesian hierarchical modeling of drug stability data.
    Chen J; Zhong J; Nie L
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2361-80. PubMed ID: 18338325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scaled marginal models for multiple continuous outcomes.
    Roy J; Lin X; Ryan LM
    Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):371-83. PubMed ID: 12925505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Disease cluster detection: a critique and a Bayesian proposal.
    Lawson AB
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(5):897-916. PubMed ID: 16453377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bayesian modelling of tuberculosis clustering from DNA fingerprint data.
    Scott AN; Joseph L; Bélisle P; Behr MA; Schwartzman K
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):140-56. PubMed ID: 17437254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Analysis of correlated data in occupational medicine: examples with binary data].
    Biggeri A; Zocchetti C
    Med Lav; 1997; 88(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 9229675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A full likelihood procedure for analysing exchangeable binary data.
    George EO; Bowman D
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):512-23. PubMed ID: 7662840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Joint modeling of survival and longitudinal data: likelihood approach revisited.
    Hsieh F; Tseng YK; Wang JL
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1037-43. PubMed ID: 17156277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biometrical modeling of twin and family data using standard mixed model software.
    Rabe-Hesketh S; Skrondal A; Gjessing HK
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):280-8. PubMed ID: 17484777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.