144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16135115)
1. The way the world might be.
Butlin RK; Tregenza T
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1205-8. PubMed ID: 16135115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive dynamics and the paradigm of diversity.
Kisdi E; Gyllenberg M
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1170-3. PubMed ID: 16135107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Issues of terminology, gradient dynamics and the ease of sympatric speciation in Adaptive Dynamics.
Waxman D; Gavrilets S
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1214-9. PubMed ID: 16135117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Adaptive dynamics: the continuity argument.
Meszéna G
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1182-5. PubMed ID: 16135110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Has adaptive dynamics contributed to the understanding of adaptive and sympatric speciation?
Gourbiere S; Mallet J
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1201-4. PubMed ID: 16135114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive dynamics as a mathematical tool for studying the ecology of speciation processes.
Doebeli M; Dieckmann U
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1194-200. PubMed ID: 16135113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptive dynamics, game theory and evolutionary population genetics.
Spencer HG; Feldman MW
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1191-3. PubMed ID: 16135112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The limitations of adaptive dynamics as a model of evolution.
Barton NH; Polechová J
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1186-90. PubMed ID: 16135111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Seven answers from adaptive dynamics.
Geritz SA; Gyllenberg M
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1174-7. PubMed ID: 16135108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 'Adaptive Dynamics' vs. 'adaptive dynamics'.
Abrams PA
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1162-5. PubMed ID: 16135105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pluralism in evolutionary theory.
Dieckmann U; Doebeli M
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1209-13. PubMed ID: 16135116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The future of a mutation-limited tool-box.
Van Dooren TJ
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1158-61. PubMed ID: 16135104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Wright meets AD: not all landscapes are adaptive.
Kirkpatrick M; Rousset F
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1166-9. PubMed ID: 16135106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What we have also learned: adaptive speciation is theoretically plausible.
Doebeli M; Dieckmann U; Metz JA; Tautz D
Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):691-5; discussion 696-9. PubMed ID: 15856711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Useful ways of being wrong.
Kokko H
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1155-7. PubMed ID: 16135103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The what and why of research on reinforcement.
Servedio MR
PLoS Biol; 2004 Dec; 2(12):e420. PubMed ID: 15597115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 20 questions on adaptive dynamics.
Waxman D; Gavrilets S
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1139-54. PubMed ID: 16135102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion.
Barrett SC; Colautti RI; Eckert CG
Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 17868309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental heterogeneity enhances clonal interference.
Campos PR; Neto PS; de Oliveira VM; Gordo I
Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1390-9. PubMed ID: 18363863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions.
Suarez AV; Tsutsui ND
Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(1):351-60. PubMed ID: 18173507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
