BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16135252)

  • 1. Spatiotemporal Properties of Common Semantic Categories for Words and Pictures.
    Bezsudnova Y; Quinn AJ; Wynn SC; Jensen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Jul; 36(8):1760-1769. PubMed ID: 38739567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induced and Evoked Brain Activation Related to the Processing of Onomatopoetic Verbs.
    Röders D; Klepp A; Schnitzler A; Biermann-Ruben K; Niccolai V
    Brain Sci; 2022 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35448012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New insights into name category-related effects: is the Age of Acquisition a possible factor?
    Adorni R; Proverbio AM
    Behav Brain Funct; 2009 Jul; 5():33. PubMed ID: 19640289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuromagnetic brain responses to words from semantic sub- and supercategories.
    Assadollahi R; Rockstroh B
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 6():57. PubMed ID: 16135252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disordered semantic representation in schizophrenic temporal cortex revealed by neuromagnetic response patterns.
    Löw A; Rockstroh B; Elbert T; Silberman Y; Bentin S
    BMC Psychiatry; 2006 May; 6():23. PubMed ID: 16719924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting the semantic category of internally generated words from neuromagnetic recordings.
    Simanova I; van Gerven MA; Oostenveld R; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 27(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 25061927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neuromagnetic evidence for early semantic access in word recognition.
    Pulvermüller F; Assadollahi R; Elbert T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2001 Jan; 13(1):201-5. PubMed ID: 11135019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of semantic processing on phonological decisions in children and adults: a magnetoencephalography (MEG) study.
    Wehner DT; Ahlfors SP; Mody M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):716-31. PubMed ID: 17538111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential Phonological and Semantic Modulation of Neurophysiological Responses to Visual Word Recognition.
    Drakesmith M; El-Deredy W; Welbourne S
    Neuropsychobiology; 2015; 72(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 26337735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography.
    Grave de Peralta Menendez R; Hauk O; Gonzalez Andino S; Vogt H; Michel C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 1997; 5(6):454-67. PubMed ID: 20408248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex.
    Hauk O; Pulvermüller F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 Mar; 21(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 14755838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On representation and reproducibility.
    Ishai A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Oct; 15(7):946-7. PubMed ID: 14614805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early influences of word length and frequency: a group study using MEG.
    Assadollahi R; Pulvermüller F
    Neuroreport; 2003 Jun; 14(8):1183-7. PubMed ID: 12821805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.