These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16135781)

  • 1. Functional dissociation of attentional selection within PFC: response and non-response related aspects of attentional selection as ascertained by fMRI.
    Liu X; Banich MT; Jacobson BL; Tanabe JL
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jun; 16(6):827-34. PubMed ID: 16135781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural correlates of preparation for action selection as a function of specific task demands.
    Donohue SE; Wendelken C; Bunge SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):694-706. PubMed ID: 18052782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI.
    Liu X; Banich MT; Jacobson BL; Tanabe JL
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1097-106. PubMed ID: 15219581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance.
    Harrison BJ; Shaw M; Yücel M; Purcell R; Brewer WJ; Strother SC; Egan GF; Olver JS; Nathan PJ; Pantelis C
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 15588609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.
    Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prefrontal-subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event-related fMRI.
    Kelly AM; Hester R; Murphy K; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ; Garavan H
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 19(11):3105-12. PubMed ID: 15182319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive control mechanisms revealed by ERP and fMRI: evidence from repeated task-switching.
    Swainson R; Cunnington R; Jackson GM; Rorden C; Peters AM; Morris PG; Jackson SR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):785-99. PubMed ID: 14511532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Who comes first? The role of the prefrontal and parietal cortex in cognitive control.
    Brass M; Ullsperger M; Knoesche TR; von Cramon DY; Phillips NA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1367-75. PubMed ID: 16197690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analogical reasoning and prefrontal cortex: evidence for separable retrieval and integration mechanisms.
    Bunge SA; Wendelken C; Badre D; Wagner AD
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Mar; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15238433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Color-word matching stroop task: separating interference and response conflict.
    Zysset S; Müller K; Lohmann G; von Cramon DY
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jan; 13(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 11133306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return.
    Chen Q; Wei P; Zhou X
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1937-46. PubMed ID: 17069483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Switching between colors and shapes on the basis of positive and negative feedback: an fMRI and EEG study on feedback-based learning.
    Zanolie K; Teng S; Donohue SE; van Duijvenvoorde AC; Band GP; Rombouts SA; Crone EA
    Cortex; 2008 May; 44(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 18387586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural networks of response shifting: influence of task speed and stimulus material.
    Loose R; Kaufmann C; Tucha O; Auer DP; Lange KW
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1090(1):146-55. PubMed ID: 16643867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An ERP investigation of the Stroop task: the role of the cingulate in attentional allocation and conflict resolution.
    Badzakova-Trajkov G; Barnett KJ; Waldie KE; Kirk IJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():139-48. PubMed ID: 19084509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural activation during response competition.
    Hazeltine E; Poldrack R; Gabrieli JD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000; 12 Suppl 2():118-29. PubMed ID: 11506652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On verbal/nonverbal modality dependence of left and right inferior prefrontal activation during performance of flanker interference task.
    Morimoto HM; Hirose S; Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Asari T; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2006-14. PubMed ID: 18416674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prefrontal activation due to Stroop interference increases during development--an event-related fNIRS study.
    Schroeter ML; Zysset S; Wahl M; von Cramon DY
    Neuroimage; 2004 Dec; 23(4):1317-25. PubMed ID: 15589096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: a comparative fMRI study on selective attention.
    Melcher T; Gruber O
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 17022954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task.
    Hanslmayr S; Pastötter B; Bäuml KH; Gruber S; Wimber M; Klimesch W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 18275330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on top-down attentional processes.
    Vanderhasselt MA; De Raedt R; Baeken C; Leyman L; Clerinx P; D'haenen H
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1137(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 17229406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.