147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16135893)
1. [Evaluation on the effect of dosimetry using a depth of calibration point or a depth of temporary dose maximum in high energy electron beams.].
Haneda K; Hatakeyama N; Koyama T
Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 16135893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical calibration dosimetry in JSMP-01: measurements using plane-parallel ion chambers.].
Araki F; Kumagai K; Yoshiura T; Oura H; Tachibana M; Moribe N; Tajima H; Yoshida A; Kido T
Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(3):114-23. PubMed ID: 16373987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical calibration dosimetry in JSMP-01: measurements using Farmer-type cylindrical ion chambers.].
Araki F; Kumagai K; Yoshiura T; Oura H; Tachibana M; Moribe N; Tajima H; Yoshida A; Kido T
Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(3):104-13. PubMed ID: 16373986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.
Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG;
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Absorbed dose measurement of photon beam with Farmer-type ionization chambers in Japanese dosimetry protocols].
Fujisaki T; Hiraoka T; Osawa A; Nakajima M; Kuwabara A; Yokoyama K; Saitoh H; Tomaru T; Inada T
Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15226645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water.
Kinoshita N; Oguchi H; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T; Shioura H; Kimura H; Doi K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):271-278. PubMed ID: 28771919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calculation of stopping-power ratios using realistic clinical electron beams.
Ding GX; Rogers DW; Mackie TR
Med Phys; 1995 May; 22(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 7643785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Replacement correction factors for cylindrical ion chambers in electron beams.
Wang LL; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4600-8. PubMed ID: 19928091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical implementation of MOSFET detectors for dosimetry in electron beams.
Bloemen-van Gurp EJ; Minken AW; Mijnheer BJ; Dehing-Oberye CJ; Lambin P
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Sep; 80(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 16916563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Water equivalence evaluation of PRESAGE(®) formulations for megavoltage electron beams: a Monte Carlo study.
Gorjiara T; Kuncic Z; Hill R; Adamovics J; Baldock C
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Dec; 35(4):455-63. PubMed ID: 23299985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A direct approach for the determination of absorbed dose from electron beams using non-water phantoms.
Lu XQ; Chin LM
Med Phys; 1995 Dec; 22(12):2083-91. PubMed ID: 8746714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in calculated effective source-surface distances with depth.
Ostwald PM; Kron T
Phys Med Biol; 1996 Oct; 41(10):2067-78. PubMed ID: 8912381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. TG-21 versus TG-25: a comparison for electrons.
Followill DS; Davis DS; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 1997 Jul; 24(7):1117-21. PubMed ID: 9243474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone and mucosal dosimetry in skin radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study using kilovoltage photon and megavoltage electron beams.
Chow JC; Jiang R
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3885-99. PubMed ID: 22642985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
