These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

773 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16136803)

  • 1. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Anderson WW; Kim YK
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 15864445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biogeographic genetic approach for testing the role of reinforcement: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Kulathinal RJ; Singh RS
    Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):210-7. PubMed ID: 10937197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in
    Davis JS; Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jan; 7(2):507-515. PubMed ID: 28116047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulating natural conditions in the laboratory: a re-examination of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Noor MA; Ortíz-Barrientos D
    Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 16502138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Rate of Evolution of Postmating-Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in Drosophila.
    Turissini DA; McGirr JA; Patel SS; David JR; Matute DR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Feb; 35(2):312-334. PubMed ID: 29048573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric Mimulus species.
    Martin NH; Willis JH
    Evolution; 2007 Jan; 61(1):68-82. PubMed ID: 17300428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptation to desiccation fails to generate pre- and postmating isolation in replicate Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations.
    Kwan L; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2010 Mar; 64(3):710-23. PubMed ID: 19817849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of sexual isolation in laboratory populations: fitness differences between mating types and the associated hybrid incompatibilities.
    Alipaz JA; Karr TL; Wu CI
    Am Nat; 2005 Apr; 165(4):429-38. PubMed ID: 15791535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive isolation among allopatric Drosophila montana populations.
    Jennings JH; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3095-108. PubMed ID: 25302639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis.
    Arthur NJ; Dyer KA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reinforced postmating reproductive isolation barriers in Neurospora, an Ascomycete microfungus.
    Turner E; Jacobson DJ; Taylor JW
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1642-56. PubMed ID: 20546092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2001 Oct; 55(10):1909-20. PubMed ID: 11761053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions.
    Etges WJ; de Oliveira CC; Gragg E; Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
    Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1106-19. PubMed ID: 17492965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Divergence in replicated phylogenies: the evolution of partial post-mating prezygotic isolation in bean weevils.
    Fricke C; Arnqvist G
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 17(6):1345-54. PubMed ID: 15525419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The genetics and ecology of reinforcement: implications for the evolution of prezygotic isolation in sympatry and beyond.
    Ortiz-Barrientos D; Grealy A; Nosil P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():156-82. PubMed ID: 19566707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetrical reinforcement and Wolbachia infection in Drosophila.
    Jaenike J; Dyer KA; Cornish C; Minhas MS
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Oct; 4(10):e325. PubMed ID: 17032063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetics of hybrid male sterility among strains and species in the Drosophila pseudoobscura species group.
    McDermott SR; Noor MA
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):1969-78. PubMed ID: 21729052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.
    Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Species hybrids in the laboratory but not in nature: a reanalysis of premating isolation between Drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis.
    Jennings JH; Etges WJ
    Evolution; 2010 Feb; 64(2):587-98. PubMed ID: 19744120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.