188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16137757)
1. Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 years at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden.
Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Svane G; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Nyström L
Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):728-33. PubMed ID: 16137757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coverage in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme, 1996-2005: correcting for the first invitation of women between 50 and 52 years.
Bennett RL; Blanks RG; Moss SM
J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Jun; 30(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 18339650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "I come because I am called": recruitment and participation in mammography screening in Uppsala, Sweden.
Willis K
Health Care Women Int; 2008 Feb; 29(2):135-50. PubMed ID: 18350420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.
Jonsson H; Bordás P; Wallin H; Nyström L; Lenner P
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17626708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overuse of mammography during the first round of an organized breast cancer screening programme.
Chamot E; Charvet A; Perneger TV
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):620-5. PubMed ID: 19522725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG;
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The psychological effects of breast screening in terms of patients' perceived health anxieties.
Swanson V; McIntosh IB; Power KG; Dobson H
Br J Clin Pract; 1996; 50(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 8733330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination.
Orton M; Fitzpatrick R; Fuller A; Mant D; Mlynek C; Thorogood M
Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Aug; 41(349):320-2. PubMed ID: 1777275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interval cancer incidence and episode sensitivity in the Norrbotten Mammography Screening Programme, Sweden.
Bordás P; Jonsson H; Nyström L; Lenner P
J Med Screen; 2009; 16(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 19349530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Population screening for breast cancer by single-view mammography in a geographic region in Sweden.
Lundgren B
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1979 Jun; 62(6):1373-9. PubMed ID: 286109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program.
Olsen AH; Agbaje OF; Myles JP; Lynge E; Duffy SW
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 16848843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Practice of large scale mammography in the Ariana area of Tunisia: prelude to a mass screening?].
Bouchlaka A; Ben Abdallah M; Ben Aissa R; Smida S; Ouechtati A; Boussen H; Gueddana N
Tunis Med; 2009 Jul; 87(7):426-31. PubMed ID: 20063674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mammography screening in the county of Copenhagen. Results of the first three screening rounds].
Tange UB; Hirsch FR; Jensen MB; Olsen AH; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Vejborg IM; Mouridsen H; Lynge E
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Feb; 164(8):1048-52. PubMed ID: 11894707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacobsen KK; von Euler Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Lynge E
J Med Screen; 2017 Mar; 24(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27206815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determinants of compliance in a cluster randomised controlled trial on screening of breast and cervix cancer in Mumbai, India. 1. Compliance to screening.
Dinshaw K; Mishra G; Shastri S; Badwe R; Kerkar R; Ramani S; Thakur M; Uplap P; Kakade A; Gupta S; Ganesh B
Oncology; 2007; 73(3-4):145-53. PubMed ID: 18408401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reattendance in the Swiss mammography screening pilot programme.
Bulliard JL; De Landtsheer JP; Levi F
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 15153319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Women's patterns of participation in mammography screening in Denmark.
von Euler-Chelpin M; Olsen AH; Njor S; Vejborg I; Schwartz W; Lynge E
Eur J Epidemiol; 2006; 21(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 16547835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
