These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16138915)

  • 1. Design of case-controls studies with unscreened controls.
    Moskvina V; Holmans P; Schmidt KM; Craddock N
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Sep; 69(Pt 5):566-76. PubMed ID: 16138915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of random controls in genetic association studies.
    Garner C
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 16534212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A strategy to discover genes that carry multi-allelic or mono-allelic risk for common diseases: a cohort allelic sums test (CAST).
    Morgenthaler S; Thilly WG
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 615(1-2):28-56. PubMed ID: 17101154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors.
    Lai R; Zhang H; Yang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 17187401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the presence of disease association.
    Li M; Li C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 32(7):589-99. PubMed ID: 18449919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sampling GWAS subjects from risk populations.
    Oexle K; Meitinger T
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 35(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 21328614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tests for gene-environment interaction from case-control data: a novel study of type I error, power and designs.
    Mukherjee B; Ahn J; Gruber SB; Rennert G; Moreno V; Chatterjee N
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 32(7):615-26. PubMed ID: 18473390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The taqI DRD2 A1 allele is associated with alcohol-dependence although its effect size is small.
    Berggren U; Fahlke C; Aronsson E; Karanti A; Eriksson M; Blennow K; Thelle D; Zetterberg H; Balldin J
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2006; 41(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 16751215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computing asymptotic power and sample size for case-control genetic association studies in the presence of phenotype and/or genotype misclassification errors.
    Ji F; Yang Y; Haynes C; Finch SJ; Gordon D
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article37. PubMed ID: 16646856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical power of association using the extreme discordant phenotype design.
    Zhang G; Nebert DW; Chakraborty R; Jin L
    Pharmacogenet Genomics; 2006 Jun; 16(6):401-13. PubMed ID: 16708049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Study design options in evaluating gene-environment interactions: practical considerations for a planned case-control study of pediatric leukemia.
    Goodman M; Dana Flanders W
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2007 Apr; 48(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 16874764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of case-control and family-based association methods: the example of sickle-cell and malaria.
    Ackerman H; Usen S; Jallow M; Sisay-Joof F; Pinder M; Kwiatkowski DP
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Sep; 69(Pt 5):559-65. PubMed ID: 16138914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying bias due to allele misclassification in case-control studies of haplotypes.
    Govindarajulu US; Spiegelman D; Miller KL; Kraft P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 30(7):590-601. PubMed ID: 16830341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies.
    Wray NR; Goddard ME; Visscher PM
    Genome Res; 2007 Oct; 17(10):1520-8. PubMed ID: 17785532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian method for gene detection and mapping, using a case and control design and DNA pooling.
    Johnson T
    Biostatistics; 2007 Jul; 8(3):546-65. PubMed ID: 16984977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative risks and effective number of meioses: a unified approach for general genetic models and phenotypes.
    Kurbasic A; Hössjer O
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Nov; 70(Pt 6):907-22. PubMed ID: 17044865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impacts of errors in individual genotyping and DNA pooling on association studies.
    Zou G; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14691952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.