These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16139163)

  • 1. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers.
    Doig GS; Simpson F
    J Crit Care; 2005 Jun; 20(2):187-91; discussion 191-3. PubMed ID: 16139163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
    Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
    Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using scratch card technology for random allocation concealment in a clinical trial with a crossover design.
    Beksinska ME; Joanis C; Smit JA; Pienaar J; Piaggio G
    Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 23188890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Different methods of allocation to groups in randomized trials are associated with different levels of bias. A meta-epidemiological study.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1070-5. PubMed ID: 21474279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization.
    Dupin-Spriet T; Fermanian J; Spriet A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1269-76. PubMed ID: 16291471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomization for clinical research: an easy-to-use spreadsheet method.
    Padhye NS; Cron SG; Gusick GM; Hamlin SK; Hanneman SK
    Res Nurs Health; 2009 Oct; 32(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 19606450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
    Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maintaining allocation concealment: following your SNOSE.
    Scales DC; Adhikari NK
    J Crit Care; 2005 Jun; 20(2):191-3. PubMed ID: 16139164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomization in clinical trials in orthodontics: its significance in research design and methods to achieve it.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 21320892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomization. Part 3: allocation concealment and randomization implementation.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):126-8. PubMed ID: 22196195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
    Randelli P; Arrigoni P; Lubowitz JH; Cabitza P; Denti M
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Jul; 24(7):834-8. PubMed ID: 18589273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias.
    Borm GF; Melis RJ; Teerenstra S; Peer PG
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3535-47. PubMed ID: 16007575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Balancing treatment allocations by clinician or center in randomized trials allows unacceptable levels of treatment prediction.
    Hills RK; Gray R; Wheatley K
    J Evid Based Med; 2009 Aug; 2(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 21349013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A note on randomization and selection bias in maintenance therapy clinical trials.
    Greenhouse JB; Meyer MM
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1991; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 1775592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of randomization techniques for clinical trials with data from the HOMERUS-trial.
    Verberk WJ; Kroon AA; Kessels AG; Nelemans PJ; Van Ree JW; Lenders JW; Thien T; Bakx JC; Van Montfrans GA; Smit AJ; Beltman FW; De Leeuw PW
    Blood Press; 2005; 14(5):306-14. PubMed ID: 16257877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Epidemiology and reporting of randomized trials employing re-randomization of patient groups: a systematic survey.
    Mills EJ; Kelly S; Wu P; Guyatt GH
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 May; 28(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 17067857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
    Brown DC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The journal impact factor as a predictor of trial quality and outcomes: cohort study of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.
    Gluud LL; Sørensen TI; Gøtzsche PC; Gluud C
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2431-5. PubMed ID: 16279896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allocation of patients to conditions in headache clinical trials: randomization, stratification, and treatment matching.
    Lipchik GL; Nicholson RA; Penzien DB
    Headache; 2005 May; 45(5):419-28. PubMed ID: 15953258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials.
    Saghaei M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Nov; 4():26. PubMed ID: 15535880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.