75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16139907)
1. "Quick and dirty numbers"? The reliability of a stated-preference technique for the measurement of preferences for resource allocation.
Schwappach DL; Strasmann TJ
J Health Econ; 2006 May; 25(3):432-48. PubMed ID: 16139907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does it matter who you are or what you gain? An experimental study of preferences for resource allocation.
Schwappach DL
Health Econ; 2003 Apr; 12(4):255-67. PubMed ID: 12652513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preferences for disclosure: the case of bedside rationing.
Schwappach DL; Koeck CM
Soc Sci Med; 2004 Nov; 59(9):1891-7. PubMed ID: 15312923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are preferences for equality a matter of perspective?
Schwappach DL
Med Decis Making; 2005; 25(4):449-59. PubMed ID: 16061897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities?
Johri M; Damschroder LJ; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Kim SY; Ubel PA
J Med Ethics; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 19103946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based guidelines, time-based health outcomes, and the Matthew effect.
Essink-Bot ML; Kruijshaar ME; Barendregt JJ; Bonneux LG
Eur J Public Health; 2007 Jun; 17(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 17060334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Priority setting and the ethics of resource allocation within VA healthcare facilities: results of a survey.
Foglia MB; Pearlman RA; Bottrell MM; Altemose JA; Fox E
Organ Ethic; 2008; 4(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 18839751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences.
Maddala T; Phillips KA; Reed Johnson F
Health Econ; 2003 Dec; 12(12):1035-47. PubMed ID: 14673812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors that affect adherence to bipolar disorder treatments: a stated-preference approach.
Johnson FR; Ozdemir S; Manjunath R; Hauber AB; Burch SP; Thompson TR
Med Care; 2007 Jun; 45(6):545-52. PubMed ID: 17515782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parents' preferences for services for children with hearing loss: a conjoint analysis study.
Fitzpatrick E; Coyle DE; Durieux-Smith A; Graham ID; Angus DE; Gaboury I
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):842-9. PubMed ID: 17982370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximising health versus sharing: measuring preferences for the allocation of the health budget.
Richardson J; Sinha K; Iezzi A; Maxwell A
Soc Sci Med; 2012 Oct; 75(8):1351-61. PubMed ID: 22795915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health priorities and public preferences: the relative importance of past health experience and future health prospects.
Dolan P; Tsuchiya A
J Health Econ; 2005 Jul; 24(4):703-14. PubMed ID: 15960992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does location matter? A study of the public's preferences for surgical care provision.
Schwappach DL; Strasmann TJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Apr; 13(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 17378873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Internet use and e-mail communications between patients and providers: a survey of rheumatology outpatients.
Siva C; Smarr KL; Hanson KD; Parikh M; Lawlor K; Ge B
J Clin Rheumatol; 2008 Dec; 14(6):318-23. PubMed ID: 19033871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating public preferences on 'severity of health' as a relevant condition for setting healthcare priorities.
Green C
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Jun; 68(12):2247-55. PubMed ID: 19406545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distribution matters: equity considerations among health planners in Tanzania.
Ottersen T; Mbilinyi D; Maestad O; Norheim OF
Health Policy; 2008 Feb; 85(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 17825939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attitudes towards priority-setting and rationing in healthcare -- an exploratory survey of Swedish medical students.
Omar F; Tinghög G; Tinghög P; Carlsson P
Scand J Public Health; 2009 Mar; 37(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 19141543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A survey of patient satisfaction and use of the Internet for health information.
Ayantunde AA; Welch NT; Parsons SL
Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Mar; 61(3):458-62. PubMed ID: 17313614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.
Rodriguez KL; Appelt CJ; Switzer GE; Sonel AF; Arnold RM
Heart Lung; 2008; 37(6):440-8. PubMed ID: 18992627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Putting the 'Q' in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for advanced ovarian cancer - An approach using data clustering methods and the internet.
Stein K; Sugar C; Velikova G; Stark D
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Jan; 43(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 17095206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
