These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16139907)

  • 41. Preferences for investment in and allocation of additional healthcare capacity.
    van Hulsen MAJ; Rohde KIM; van Exel J
    Soc Sci Med; 2023 Mar; 320():115717. PubMed ID: 36716698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior.
    Hainmueller J; Hangartner D; Yamamoto T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Feb; 112(8):2395-400. PubMed ID: 25646415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The prioritization preferences of pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review members and the Canadian public: a stated-preferences comparison.
    Skedgel C
    Curr Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(5):322-328. PubMed ID: 27803596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Identifying differences in communication technology preferences across the lifespan.
    Weinberg JL; Guarino JM; Savoy ML; Horton T; Reed J
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2012 Nov; 60(11):2176-7. PubMed ID: 23148426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development of a stated-preference instrument to prioritize treatment goals in recent onset schizophrenia.
    Beusterien K; Chan E; Such P; de Jong Laird A; Heres S; Amos K; Loze JY; Nylander AG; Robinson P; Bridges JFP
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2129-2136. PubMed ID: 28945106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Mathematics. Quick and dirty refereeing?
    Sudan M
    Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5637):1191-2. PubMed ID: 12947187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The value of knowing: preferences for genetic testing to diagnose rare muscle diseases.
    Mansfield C; Boeri M; Coulter J; Baranowski E; Sparks S; An Haack K; Hamed A
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2024 Apr; 19(1):173. PubMed ID: 38649872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Systematic Review of the Relative Social Value of Child and Adult Health.
    Peasgood T; Howell M; Raghunandan R; Salisbury A; Sellars M; Chen G; Coast J; Craig JC; Devlin NJ; Howard K; Lancsar E; Petrou S; Ratcliffe J; Viney R; Wong G; Norman R; Donaldson C;
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2024 Feb; 42(2):177-198. PubMed ID: 37945778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Patient Preferences for Pharmaceutical and Device-Based Treatments for Uncontrolled Hypertension: Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Kandzari DE; Weber MA; Poulos C; Coulter J; Cohen SA; DeBruin V; Jones D; Pathak A
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2023 Jan; 16(1):e008997. PubMed ID: 36484251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. What Does the Public Want? Structural Consideration of Citizen Preferences in Health Care Coverage Decisions.
    Cleemput I; Devriese S; Kohn L; Devos C; van Til J; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM; van de Voorde C
    MDM Policy Pract; 2018; 3(2):2381468318799628. PubMed ID: 35187243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Travel changes and equitable access to urban parks in the post COVID-19 pandemic period: Evidence from Wuhan, China.
    Zhang W; Li S; Gao Y; Liu W; Jiao Y; Zeng C; Gao L; Wang T
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 304():114217. PubMed ID: 34883435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Measuring Public Preferences for Health Outcomes and Expenditures in a Context of Healthcare Resource Re-Allocation.
    Krucien N; Pelletier-Fleury N; Gafni A
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Mar; 37(3):407-417. PubMed ID: 30499065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparing the Relative Importance of Attributes of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatments to Patients and Physicians in the United States: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.
    González JM; Doan J; Gebben DJ; Boeri M; Fishman M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Aug; 36(8):973-986. PubMed ID: 29869777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus.
    Farmakas A; Theodorou M; Galanis P; Karayiannis G; Ghobrial S; Polyzos N; Papastavrou E; Agapidaki E; Souliotis K
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2017; 15():16. PubMed ID: 28808427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Similarities and differences between stakeholders' opinions on using Health Technology Assessment (HTA) information across five European countries: results from the EQUIPT survey.
    Vokó Z; Cheung KL; Józwiak-Hagymásy J; Wolfenstetter S; Jones T; Muñoz C; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M; de Vries H; Pokhrel S;
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 May; 14(1):38. PubMed ID: 27230485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Constant-sum paired comparisons for eliciting stated preferences: a tutorial.
    Skedgel C; Regier DA
    Patient; 2015 Apr; 8(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 25038741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.
    Whitty JA; Lancsar E; Rixon K; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    Patient; 2014; 7(4):365-86. PubMed ID: 24872225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.
    Skedgel CD; Wailoo AJ; Akehurst RL
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1227-40. PubMed ID: 23758539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The relevance of personal characteristics in allocating health care resources-controversial preferences of laypersons with different educational backgrounds.
    Winkelhage J; Diederich A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2012 Jan; 9(1):223-43. PubMed ID: 22470289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.